Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3392 - Post-hoc analysis of the nintedanib exposure-response relationships in the CHIVA trial in advanced ovarian cancer: (a GINECO study)
Presenter: Skerdi HAVIARI
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
714 - The feasibility and efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian insufficiency in patient with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors
Presenter: Min Kyu Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1753 - Ex vivo cytotoxicity and in vivo antitumor activity of a novel highly selective STAT3 inhibitor YHO-1701 for ovarian and endometrial cancer
Presenter: Kosei Hasegawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3739 - Mutational landscapes and tumor mutational burden expression in endometrial cancer
Presenter: Yingli Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2109 - Clinical features and frequency of mismatch repair protein deficiency in ovarian clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma patients.
Presenter: Kazuhiro Takehara
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4554 - Prospective study evaluating white adipose tissue inflammation and clinicopathologic features in endometrial cancer
Presenter: Lea Moukarzel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3645 - Cancer-specific survival with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage I endometrial cancer
Presenter: Jenny Ko
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3394 - Pembrolizumab in Patients with MSI-H Advanced Endometrial Cancer from the KEYNOTE-158 Study
Presenter: David Omalley
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3388 - Who drops out of cervical cancer screening? Results from the EDIFICE 6 survey
Presenter: Thibault de La Motte Rouge
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2485 - Identification of a RNA-Seq Based Signature to Improve Prognostic for Uterine Sarcoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract