Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5134 - Early prediction of the platinum-resistant relapse risk using the CA125 modeled kinetic parameter KELIM: a pooled analysis of AGO-OVAR 7 & 9; ICON 7 (AGO/GINECO/ MRC CTU/GCIG trials).
Presenter: OLIVIER COLOMBAN
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4410 - Mirvetuximab soravtansine, a folate receptor alpha (FRa)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in combination with carboplatin and bevacizumab: Initial results from a Phase 1b study in patients (pts) with ovarian cancer
Presenter: David Omalley
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5077 - Response to Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) and Weekly Paclitaxel (wpac) in Platinum Resistant (PR) Ovarian Cancer (OC) by BRCA mutation status
Presenter: Louise Bremer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3483 - Impact of prior pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC): Sub-group analysis from a randomized, open-label study comparing trabectedin (T) and PLD versus PLD alone in ROC (ET743-OVC-3006)
Presenter: Bradley Monk
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5423 - OCTAVE - A phase I study of enadenotucirev, an oncolytic group B adenovirus, in combination with weekly paclitaxel in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer
Presenter: Iain McNeish
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1385 - Phase I study of low dose whole abdominal radiation therapy (LDWART) in combination with weekly paclitaxel (wP) for platinum resistant ovarian cancer (PROC)
Presenter: Natalie Ngoi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2090 - Phase 1b/2a study assessing the safety and efficacy of adding AL3818 (Anlotinib) to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in subjects with recurrent or metastatic endometrial, ovarian or cervical carcinoma
Presenter: David Miller
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1960 - Phase I Study of Intraperitoneal TRX-E-002-1 in Subjects with Persistent or Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Cancer: Three-month Follow-up Results of the Dose Escalation Phase
Presenter: Jermaine Coward
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4288 - Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with ovarian cancer
Presenter: Mi Yang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3433 - Tumor Microvessel Density for predicting Nintedanib activity: data from the randomized CHIVA trial (a GINECO study)
Presenter: Maud Villemin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract