Abstract 3655
Background
Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and surgery may be one of the most important strategy for the treatment of lung cancer patients. However, the procedure of lung cancer diagnosis from initial suspicion to final confirmation is not efficient due to low sensitivity of current diagnostic methods and difficulties involved in tumor tissue biopsy in lung cancer compared to other cancer types. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility of liquid biopsy using circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis for the better diagnosis of lung cancer.
Methods
In this study, we blindly analyzed both CTCs and ctDNA in the blood samples derived from 109 patients including histology-proven and clinically suspicious lung cancer patients to test the sensitivity of liquid biopsy methods. CTC analysis was done by CytoGen’s liquid biopsy platform, in which viable CTCs were isolated by size-based filtration with gravity and validated by immunostaining of EpCAM or CK, excluding CD45 positive cells and enumerated by CytoGen’s cell imaging software. Lung cancer diagnosis was predicted by a cut-off, 2 ≥ CTC in 5 ml peripheral blood. For ctDNA analysis, EDGC F-Can platform was used to analyze single nucleotide variations of very low variant allele frequencies by utilizing unique molecular indexes and a novel read error correction algorithm. For comparison, we also analyzed the levels of conventional tumor markers (CEA, cyfra21-1 and NSE) in the patient cohort.
Results
Compared to the diagnostic sensitivities of conventional tumor markers (CEA 29%; cyfra21-1 41%; NSE 39%), both assays of CTCs and ctDNA showed higher diagnostic sensitivity in predicting primary lung cancer (CTCs 67%; ctDNA 83%). When the assays of CTCs and ctDNA were combined for the diagnosis, the sensitivity was increased up to 98%.
Conclusions
Collectively, this study suggests that combined CTCs and ctDNA assay would be useful for the diagnosis of primary lung cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Cytogen, Inc., EDGC, Inc., Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center
Funding
Has not received any funding
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract