Abstract 3053
Background
Combination treatment of FTD/TPI plus BEV in the C-TASK FORCE showed a promising activity in pts with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies; however, due to the small sample size, it remains unclear if this combination works in the same way; RAS wild-type or mutant. We investigated the efficacy and safety of this combination in separate cohorts of RAS wild-type and mutant.
Methods
mCRC pts refractory or intolerant to prior treatments with fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, an angiogenesis inhibitor, and an anti-EGFR antibody if RAS wild-type, and without FTD/TPI and regorafenib. Pts received FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12) and BEV (5mg/kg, day1 and 15) every four weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). A threshold and expected value of the DCR in each wild-type and mutant were set as 44% and 65%, respectively. Assuming a one-sided significance level of 5.0%, each target sample size was estimated to be 49 to achieve a power of 90%.
Results
From Jan to Sep 2018, 102 pts were enrolled, and 98 pts fulfilled the eligibility (49 pts in each). Baseline characteristics of RAS wild-type vs. mutant were follows; median age, 65 vs. 64 years: male, 51% vs. 59%: ECOG PS 0, 69% vs. 59%: left-sided primary, 84% vs. 67%: number of metastasis of > 2, 71% vs. 74%: median time from diagnosis of metastasis, 32.9 vs 21.2 months. The DCR in RAS wild-type was 65.3% (90% CI: 52.6-76.5%, p = 0.0022), while that in RAS mutant was 55.1% (90% CI: 42.4-67.3%, p = 0.0780). There was not a statistically significant difference in DCR between RAS wild-type and mutant after adjustment of baseline characteristics (adjusted odds ratio=0.48, 90% CI: 0.21-1.10, p = 0.1435). Partial response was observed only in three pts with RAS wild-type. There were neither unexpected safety signals nor treatment related death.
Conclusions
FTD/TPI plus BEV showed a promising activity with an acceptable safety profile for previously treated mCRC harboring either RAS wild-type or mutant. Survival outcome will be presented at the meeting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Japanese Fondation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer (JFMC).
Funding
Japanese Fondation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer (JFMC).
Disclosure
M. Nakamura: Honoraria (self): Taiho Yakuhin; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Chugai Seiyaku; Honoraria (self): Merck. A. Makiyama: Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lily Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lily Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda Pharm. K. Oba: Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharm; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharm; Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharm; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Tsumura Pharm. T. Yoshino: Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (self): Daiichi Sankyo Company; Research grant / Funding (self): Parexel; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono Pharmaceutical. K. Yoshida: Research grant / Funding (self): Chugai Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (self): MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono Pharma; Honoraria (self): EA Pharma; Honoraria (self): Johnson & Johnson; Honoraria (self): SBI Pharma; Honoraria (self): Olympus; Honoraria (self): Covidien; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): TERUMO; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Tsumura; Honoraria (self): Asahi Kasei; Honoraria (self): Pharma International Osaka; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha. K. Yamazaki: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai. E. Oki: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai Pharm. T. Takahashi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho Pharm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai Pharm. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4413 - Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF trial
Presenter: Ghassan Abou-Alfa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4710 - Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5509 - A Randomized Controlled, Open label, Adaptive Phase-3 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of EndoTAG-1 Plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine alone in Patients with Measurable Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Failed on FOLFIRINOX Treatment (NCT03126435)
Presenter: Li-Tzong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1463 - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction – Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.
Presenter: Sylvie Lorenzen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2392 - GLOW: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Zolbetuximab + CAPOX Compared With Placebo + CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Patients With CLD18.2⁺/HER2⁻ Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Manish Shah
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5217 - PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a comparative randomized phase II trial
Presenter: Rosine Guimbaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1726 - Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel + ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy: WJOG10617G/P-SELECT
Presenter: Kenro Hirata
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2279 - FRONTiER: A Feasibility Trial of Nivolumab With Neoadjuvant CF or DCF Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4912 - A phase Ib/II study of AK104, a PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With mXELOX as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jiafu Ji
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3780 - Perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone in patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: DANTE, a randomized, open-label phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO and the SAKK.
Presenter: Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract