Abstract 3447
Background
Conflicting results on the the impact of cancer first treatment delay (FTD) on survival have been reported between several studies, and its importance has yet to be determined. We currently do not have any study in breast cancer (BC) analyzing how FTD influences the prognosis of the patients according to different inmunophenotypes. We conducted a study where we examined the relationship between survival and three periods of diagnostic-therapeutic delay, 30, 60 and 90 days.
Methods
This multicentre cohort study included BC patients from screening CAMISS PROJECT, during 2000-2006 with follow-up until 2014. Cox regression analysis, crude and multivariate, was applied to estimate risk of death. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was adjusted by FTD, stage, immunophenotypes of BC and comorbidity
Results
The study included 738 women aged 45-69 years. Median time of FTD was 58 days. First treatment aplied was surgery for all populations. 42% of BC presented as stage I and 34% stage II. 24% of patients had comorbidities. 21% expressed HER2, 80% estrogen receptors and 61% progresterone. There were 53% of Luminal A tumors, followed by 27% Luminal B, of which 10% also expressed HER2, 9% were HER2 overexpressing tumors, and 11% triple negative. In the crude analysis none of the three FDT cut-off points had a significant relationship with overall survival. Multivariate analysis adjusted for phenotypes, comorbidity and stage, showed worse prognosis tendency in DT30 and DT90, with a statistically significant level in DT60, hazard ratio [HR] 1,57; 95% IC (1,04-2,38). When we analyzed survival according to DT60 and BC subtypes there was more significant risk of death among HER2 subtype HR 2,91; 95% IC (1,63-5,21) and triple negative HR 1,90; 95% IC(1,01-3,60) comparing to Luminal A. No relationship was seen in Luminal B; Table.Table:
251P
aHR30 | aHR60 | aHR90 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment delay (days) | <30 | Ref | ||
> =30 | 1,53 (0,84-2,78) | |||
<60 | R | |||
> =60 | 1,57 (1,04-2,38) | |||
<90 | Ref | |||
> =90 | 1,72(1,00-2,95) | |||
Stage | I | Ref | Ref | Ref |
InSitu | 0,29 (0,07-1,24) | 0,29 (0,07-1,23) | 1,47 (0,89-2,44) | |
II | 1,40 (0,84-2,33) | 1,38 (0,83-2,30) | 3,01 (1,67-5,41) | |
III | 4,42 (2,66-7,35) | 4,43 (2,67-7,35) | 1,95 (1,02-3,72) | |
Fenotipe | Luminal A | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Luminal B | 1,40 (0,85-2,31) | 1,45 (0,88-2,40) | 0,29 (0,07-1,22) | |
Her2 | 2,89 (1,62-5,18) | 2,91 (1,63-5,21) | 1,38 (0,83-2,31) | |
Triple Negative | 1,96 (1,01-3,66) | 1,90 (1,01-3,60) | 4,23 (2,56-7,01) | |
Comorbidity | Absence | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Presence | 1,63 (1,06-2,52) | 1,61 (1,04-2,48) | 1,59 (1,03-2,46) |
Conclusions
Waiting 60 days to initiate treatment was associated with a significantly worse overall survivall among triple negative and HER2 BC. We consider it of importance to offer early treatment to aggressive BC subtypes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
REDISSEC-CAMISS Group-(Research Network in Health Services in Chronic Diseases).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5063 - Does Nutritional Status Affect Treatment Tolarability, Response and Survival in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients? Results of Prospective Multicenter Study
Presenter: Senem Karabulut
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2717 - Ramucirumab use in patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer (AGC) or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma in Spain: RAMIS observational study
Presenter: Federico Longo Munoz
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3187 - Gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor: Exploratory analysis in the patients who were enrolled in JCOG0705/KGCA01 phase III trial (REGATTA) and could continue chemotherapy
Presenter: Takaki Yoshikawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4765 - A prospective observational study on the optimal maintenance strategy in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab based therapy
Presenter: Qian Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3500 - Randomised phase 2 trial of first-line docetaxel, carboplatin, capecitabine (CTX) and epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine (EOX) in advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (SEED)
Presenter: Peter Petersen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5197 - Ramucirumab in the treatment of refractory metastatic gastric cancer: results from the RamSelGa trial.
Presenter: Alexey Tryakin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2011 - Regorafenib in combination with Paclitaxel for beyond first-line treatment of advanced esophagogastric cancer (REPEAT): a phase Ib trial with expansion cohort
Presenter: Mohammed Khurshed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2117 - The relationship between the survival and fixed dosing of S-1 in advanced gastric cancer patients by pooled analysis using individual data from four Japanese randomized phase III trials
Presenter: Wataru Ichikawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2669 - A Phase 1b Study of Oraxol in Combination with Ramucirumab in Patients with Gastric or Esophageal Cancers who failed previous chemotherapy
Presenter: Ming Huang Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3240 - Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in European patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (mGC): an analysis of the TAGS study
Presenter: Maria Alsina
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract