Abstract 3447
Background
Conflicting results on the the impact of cancer first treatment delay (FTD) on survival have been reported between several studies, and its importance has yet to be determined. We currently do not have any study in breast cancer (BC) analyzing how FTD influences the prognosis of the patients according to different inmunophenotypes. We conducted a study where we examined the relationship between survival and three periods of diagnostic-therapeutic delay, 30, 60 and 90 days.
Methods
This multicentre cohort study included BC patients from screening CAMISS PROJECT, during 2000-2006 with follow-up until 2014. Cox regression analysis, crude and multivariate, was applied to estimate risk of death. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was adjusted by FTD, stage, immunophenotypes of BC and comorbidity
Results
The study included 738 women aged 45-69 years. Median time of FTD was 58 days. First treatment aplied was surgery for all populations. 42% of BC presented as stage I and 34% stage II. 24% of patients had comorbidities. 21% expressed HER2, 80% estrogen receptors and 61% progresterone. There were 53% of Luminal A tumors, followed by 27% Luminal B, of which 10% also expressed HER2, 9% were HER2 overexpressing tumors, and 11% triple negative. In the crude analysis none of the three FDT cut-off points had a significant relationship with overall survival. Multivariate analysis adjusted for phenotypes, comorbidity and stage, showed worse prognosis tendency in DT30 and DT90, with a statistically significant level in DT60, hazard ratio [HR] 1,57; 95% IC (1,04-2,38). When we analyzed survival according to DT60 and BC subtypes there was more significant risk of death among HER2 subtype HR 2,91; 95% IC (1,63-5,21) and triple negative HR 1,90; 95% IC(1,01-3,60) comparing to Luminal A. No relationship was seen in Luminal B; Table.Table:
251P
aHR30 | aHR60 | aHR90 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment delay (days) | <30 | Ref | ||
> =30 | 1,53 (0,84-2,78) | |||
<60 | R | |||
> =60 | 1,57 (1,04-2,38) | |||
<90 | Ref | |||
> =90 | 1,72(1,00-2,95) | |||
Stage | I | Ref | Ref | Ref |
InSitu | 0,29 (0,07-1,24) | 0,29 (0,07-1,23) | 1,47 (0,89-2,44) | |
II | 1,40 (0,84-2,33) | 1,38 (0,83-2,30) | 3,01 (1,67-5,41) | |
III | 4,42 (2,66-7,35) | 4,43 (2,67-7,35) | 1,95 (1,02-3,72) | |
Fenotipe | Luminal A | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Luminal B | 1,40 (0,85-2,31) | 1,45 (0,88-2,40) | 0,29 (0,07-1,22) | |
Her2 | 2,89 (1,62-5,18) | 2,91 (1,63-5,21) | 1,38 (0,83-2,31) | |
Triple Negative | 1,96 (1,01-3,66) | 1,90 (1,01-3,60) | 4,23 (2,56-7,01) | |
Comorbidity | Absence | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Presence | 1,63 (1,06-2,52) | 1,61 (1,04-2,48) | 1,59 (1,03-2,46) |
Conclusions
Waiting 60 days to initiate treatment was associated with a significantly worse overall survivall among triple negative and HER2 BC. We consider it of importance to offer early treatment to aggressive BC subtypes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
REDISSEC-CAMISS Group-(Research Network in Health Services in Chronic Diseases).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4546 - Efficacy and toxicity of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as induction or palliative treatment in advanced esophageal cancer patients
Presenter: Femke de Man
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5908 - Perioperative chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (FLOT) versus Epirubicin, Platinum and Capecitabine or Flourouracil (EOX/ECF) in Resectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma- Safety and response data from India.
Presenter: Tanuj Chawla
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
937 - Phase II Study of Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with S-1 plus Cisplatin in Clinically Resectable Type 4 or Large Type 3 Gastric Cancer: OGSG1205
Presenter: Shunji Endo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1119 - Observational Study of the Peritoneal Washing Cytology Positive Gastric Cancer without Gross Peritoneal Metastasis Underwent Radical D2 Gastrectomy.
Presenter: Jun Eul Hwang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3744 - Primary results of multicenter phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin for locally advanced gastric cancer (Neo G-SOX PII)
Presenter: Akira Miki
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5091 - Multicenter Phase I/II Feasibility Study of Adjuvant Treatment with S-1 in Patients after R0-Resection of Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Esophagogastric Junction (GMBH-STO-0114)
Presenter: Kathrin Heinrich
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2891 - A phase I study of Docetaxel/Oxaliplatin/S-1 (DOS) combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
Presenter: Kei Hosoda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2994 - Apatinib combined with docetaxel in second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a prospective clinical study (Data updated)
Presenter: Mudan Yang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3000 - A multicenter phase II study of TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in patients with pre-treated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1604)
Presenter: Daisuke Takahari
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4653 - Impact of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Versus Paclitaxel on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Patients With Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer That Has Progressed After First-Line Chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-061)
Presenter: Eric Van Cutsem
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract