Abstract 3447
Background
Conflicting results on the the impact of cancer first treatment delay (FTD) on survival have been reported between several studies, and its importance has yet to be determined. We currently do not have any study in breast cancer (BC) analyzing how FTD influences the prognosis of the patients according to different inmunophenotypes. We conducted a study where we examined the relationship between survival and three periods of diagnostic-therapeutic delay, 30, 60 and 90 days.
Methods
This multicentre cohort study included BC patients from screening CAMISS PROJECT, during 2000-2006 with follow-up until 2014. Cox regression analysis, crude and multivariate, was applied to estimate risk of death. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was adjusted by FTD, stage, immunophenotypes of BC and comorbidity
Results
The study included 738 women aged 45-69 years. Median time of FTD was 58 days. First treatment aplied was surgery for all populations. 42% of BC presented as stage I and 34% stage II. 24% of patients had comorbidities. 21% expressed HER2, 80% estrogen receptors and 61% progresterone. There were 53% of Luminal A tumors, followed by 27% Luminal B, of which 10% also expressed HER2, 9% were HER2 overexpressing tumors, and 11% triple negative. In the crude analysis none of the three FDT cut-off points had a significant relationship with overall survival. Multivariate analysis adjusted for phenotypes, comorbidity and stage, showed worse prognosis tendency in DT30 and DT90, with a statistically significant level in DT60, hazard ratio [HR] 1,57; 95% IC (1,04-2,38). When we analyzed survival according to DT60 and BC subtypes there was more significant risk of death among HER2 subtype HR 2,91; 95% IC (1,63-5,21) and triple negative HR 1,90; 95% IC(1,01-3,60) comparing to Luminal A. No relationship was seen in Luminal B; Table.Table:
251P
aHR30 | aHR60 | aHR90 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment delay (days) | <30 | Ref | ||
> =30 | 1,53 (0,84-2,78) | |||
<60 | R | |||
> =60 | 1,57 (1,04-2,38) | |||
<90 | Ref | |||
> =90 | 1,72(1,00-2,95) | |||
Stage | I | Ref | Ref | Ref |
InSitu | 0,29 (0,07-1,24) | 0,29 (0,07-1,23) | 1,47 (0,89-2,44) | |
II | 1,40 (0,84-2,33) | 1,38 (0,83-2,30) | 3,01 (1,67-5,41) | |
III | 4,42 (2,66-7,35) | 4,43 (2,67-7,35) | 1,95 (1,02-3,72) | |
Fenotipe | Luminal A | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Luminal B | 1,40 (0,85-2,31) | 1,45 (0,88-2,40) | 0,29 (0,07-1,22) | |
Her2 | 2,89 (1,62-5,18) | 2,91 (1,63-5,21) | 1,38 (0,83-2,31) | |
Triple Negative | 1,96 (1,01-3,66) | 1,90 (1,01-3,60) | 4,23 (2,56-7,01) | |
Comorbidity | Absence | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Presence | 1,63 (1,06-2,52) | 1,61 (1,04-2,48) | 1,59 (1,03-2,46) |
Conclusions
Waiting 60 days to initiate treatment was associated with a significantly worse overall survivall among triple negative and HER2 BC. We consider it of importance to offer early treatment to aggressive BC subtypes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
REDISSEC-CAMISS Group-(Research Network in Health Services in Chronic Diseases).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4581 - Timing to achieve complete response (CR) after definitive chemoradiotherapy (ChRT) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal (SCCAC) with and without HIV infection: a multicenter retrospective study
Presenter: Marcos Camandaroba
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1712 - Planned organ preservation for T2 T3 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma. A possible option using chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB). A French multicenter study.
Presenter: Jean-Pierre Gérard
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4639 - A Phase 1b Study of E7046 (AN0025) in Combination With Radiotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) in Preoperative Treatment of Rectal Cancer
Presenter: Lucjan Wyrwicz
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2310 - Upfront radical surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by TME in clinical stage II/III patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis
Presenter: Ahrong Ham
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2747 - Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with/without lateral lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer: Which patients can benefit?
Presenter: Daisuke Nishizaki
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2877 - The impact of completeness of chemotherapy on the efficacy of irinotecan in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer.
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3050 - Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer
Presenter: Wei-Chih Su
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4109 - Feasibility of chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients with peritumoral abscesses and fistulas: a case-control non-inferiority trial
Presenter: Valerii Ivanov
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4813 - Differential of the nutritional index before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as a prognostic factor of recurrence in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum
Presenter: Leslie Navia-Ortuño
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5345 - Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Presenter: Pojung Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract