Abstract 3447
Background
Conflicting results on the the impact of cancer first treatment delay (FTD) on survival have been reported between several studies, and its importance has yet to be determined. We currently do not have any study in breast cancer (BC) analyzing how FTD influences the prognosis of the patients according to different inmunophenotypes. We conducted a study where we examined the relationship between survival and three periods of diagnostic-therapeutic delay, 30, 60 and 90 days.
Methods
This multicentre cohort study included BC patients from screening CAMISS PROJECT, during 2000-2006 with follow-up until 2014. Cox regression analysis, crude and multivariate, was applied to estimate risk of death. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was adjusted by FTD, stage, immunophenotypes of BC and comorbidity
Results
The study included 738 women aged 45-69 years. Median time of FTD was 58 days. First treatment aplied was surgery for all populations. 42% of BC presented as stage I and 34% stage II. 24% of patients had comorbidities. 21% expressed HER2, 80% estrogen receptors and 61% progresterone. There were 53% of Luminal A tumors, followed by 27% Luminal B, of which 10% also expressed HER2, 9% were HER2 overexpressing tumors, and 11% triple negative. In the crude analysis none of the three FDT cut-off points had a significant relationship with overall survival. Multivariate analysis adjusted for phenotypes, comorbidity and stage, showed worse prognosis tendency in DT30 and DT90, with a statistically significant level in DT60, hazard ratio [HR] 1,57; 95% IC (1,04-2,38). When we analyzed survival according to DT60 and BC subtypes there was more significant risk of death among HER2 subtype HR 2,91; 95% IC (1,63-5,21) and triple negative HR 1,90; 95% IC(1,01-3,60) comparing to Luminal A. No relationship was seen in Luminal B; Table.Table:
251P
aHR30 | aHR60 | aHR90 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment delay (days) | <30 | Ref | ||
> =30 | 1,53 (0,84-2,78) | |||
<60 | R | |||
> =60 | 1,57 (1,04-2,38) | |||
<90 | Ref | |||
> =90 | 1,72(1,00-2,95) | |||
Stage | I | Ref | Ref | Ref |
InSitu | 0,29 (0,07-1,24) | 0,29 (0,07-1,23) | 1,47 (0,89-2,44) | |
II | 1,40 (0,84-2,33) | 1,38 (0,83-2,30) | 3,01 (1,67-5,41) | |
III | 4,42 (2,66-7,35) | 4,43 (2,67-7,35) | 1,95 (1,02-3,72) | |
Fenotipe | Luminal A | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Luminal B | 1,40 (0,85-2,31) | 1,45 (0,88-2,40) | 0,29 (0,07-1,22) | |
Her2 | 2,89 (1,62-5,18) | 2,91 (1,63-5,21) | 1,38 (0,83-2,31) | |
Triple Negative | 1,96 (1,01-3,66) | 1,90 (1,01-3,60) | 4,23 (2,56-7,01) | |
Comorbidity | Absence | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Presence | 1,63 (1,06-2,52) | 1,61 (1,04-2,48) | 1,59 (1,03-2,46) |
Conclusions
Waiting 60 days to initiate treatment was associated with a significantly worse overall survivall among triple negative and HER2 BC. We consider it of importance to offer early treatment to aggressive BC subtypes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
REDISSEC-CAMISS Group-(Research Network in Health Services in Chronic Diseases).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5887 - Factors of importance in procuring tumoroids from colorectal liver metastasis biopsies for precision medicine.
Presenter: Lars Henrik Jensen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2196 - FUSAFE individual patient data meta-analysis (MA) to assess the performance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene polymorphisms for predicting grade 4-5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity
Presenter: Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2859 - Treatments (tx) after progression to first-line FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab (bev) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts): A pooled analysis of TRIBE and TRIBE-2 studies by GONO.
Presenter: Daniele Rossini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3888 - Randomized phase III study of sequential treatment with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (FP) plus bevacizumab (BEV) followed by the addition with oxaliplatin (OX) versus initial combination with OX+FP+ BEV in the first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: The C-cubed study
Presenter: Takeshi Nagasaka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1065 - Early tumour shrinkage (ETS), depth of response (DpR) and associated survival outcomes in patients (pts) with RAS wild type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) classified according to Köhne prognostic category: retrospective analysis of the panitumumab (Pmab) PRIME study
Presenter: Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1702 - Randomized phase II trial of CAPOX with planned oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of colon cancer (CCOG-1302 study)
Presenter: Hiroyuki Yokoyama
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5104 - A metabolomic recurrence score for risk-stratification of elderly patients (pts) with early colorectal cancer (eCRC)
Presenter: Samantha Di Donato
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5285 - RAS mutant allele fraction in plasma predicts benefit to anti-angiogenic based first line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Giulia Martini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1790 - Impact of prophylactic systemic antibiotics (SA) on outcome of patients (pts) with RAS-wildtype (RAS-wt) metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) treated with cetuximab-based first-line therapy. Subgroup analysis of the german non-interventional study ERBITAG
Presenter: Stephan Sahm
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3059 - Intraoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU for colorectal cancer patients receiving curative resection (IOCCRC): A randomized, multicenter, prospective, phase III trial
Presenter: Rongxin Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract