Abstract 3447
Background
Conflicting results on the the impact of cancer first treatment delay (FTD) on survival have been reported between several studies, and its importance has yet to be determined. We currently do not have any study in breast cancer (BC) analyzing how FTD influences the prognosis of the patients according to different inmunophenotypes. We conducted a study where we examined the relationship between survival and three periods of diagnostic-therapeutic delay, 30, 60 and 90 days.
Methods
This multicentre cohort study included BC patients from screening CAMISS PROJECT, during 2000-2006 with follow-up until 2014. Cox regression analysis, crude and multivariate, was applied to estimate risk of death. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was adjusted by FTD, stage, immunophenotypes of BC and comorbidity
Results
The study included 738 women aged 45-69 years. Median time of FTD was 58 days. First treatment aplied was surgery for all populations. 42% of BC presented as stage I and 34% stage II. 24% of patients had comorbidities. 21% expressed HER2, 80% estrogen receptors and 61% progresterone. There were 53% of Luminal A tumors, followed by 27% Luminal B, of which 10% also expressed HER2, 9% were HER2 overexpressing tumors, and 11% triple negative. In the crude analysis none of the three FDT cut-off points had a significant relationship with overall survival. Multivariate analysis adjusted for phenotypes, comorbidity and stage, showed worse prognosis tendency in DT30 and DT90, with a statistically significant level in DT60, hazard ratio [HR] 1,57; 95% IC (1,04-2,38). When we analyzed survival according to DT60 and BC subtypes there was more significant risk of death among HER2 subtype HR 2,91; 95% IC (1,63-5,21) and triple negative HR 1,90; 95% IC(1,01-3,60) comparing to Luminal A. No relationship was seen in Luminal B; Table.Table:
251P
aHR30 | aHR60 | aHR90 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment delay (days) | <30 | Ref | ||
> =30 | 1,53 (0,84-2,78) | |||
<60 | R | |||
> =60 | 1,57 (1,04-2,38) | |||
<90 | Ref | |||
> =90 | 1,72(1,00-2,95) | |||
Stage | I | Ref | Ref | Ref |
InSitu | 0,29 (0,07-1,24) | 0,29 (0,07-1,23) | 1,47 (0,89-2,44) | |
II | 1,40 (0,84-2,33) | 1,38 (0,83-2,30) | 3,01 (1,67-5,41) | |
III | 4,42 (2,66-7,35) | 4,43 (2,67-7,35) | 1,95 (1,02-3,72) | |
Fenotipe | Luminal A | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Luminal B | 1,40 (0,85-2,31) | 1,45 (0,88-2,40) | 0,29 (0,07-1,22) | |
Her2 | 2,89 (1,62-5,18) | 2,91 (1,63-5,21) | 1,38 (0,83-2,31) | |
Triple Negative | 1,96 (1,01-3,66) | 1,90 (1,01-3,60) | 4,23 (2,56-7,01) | |
Comorbidity | Absence | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Presence | 1,63 (1,06-2,52) | 1,61 (1,04-2,48) | 1,59 (1,03-2,46) |
Conclusions
Waiting 60 days to initiate treatment was associated with a significantly worse overall survivall among triple negative and HER2 BC. We consider it of importance to offer early treatment to aggressive BC subtypes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
REDISSEC-CAMISS Group-(Research Network in Health Services in Chronic Diseases).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
740 - A real-world analysis of the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with PARPIs
Presenter: Alejandra Martinez de Pinillos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5867 - Incidence of tumour BRCA1/2 variants in relapsed, platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer
Presenter: Robert Morgan
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2966 - Frequency of mutations in 21 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes among 882 high-risk individuals
Presenter: Jihong Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1687 - BRCA testing of 1,284 Brazilian patients for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in a routine diagnostic setting
Presenter: Fernanda Milanezi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3162 - A multi-center integrative study on cancer predisposition genes in Chinese patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma
Presenter: Changbin Zhu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5993 - Incidental Early Occult Ovarian Cancer after Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers followed in a Community Public Hospital
Presenter: Begona Grana Suarez
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5334 - Response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer (OC) patients with or without prior breast cancer (BC), stratified by BRCA mutation (BRCAm) status
Presenter: Angela George
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4565 - Advanced ovarian cancer: is residual disease after debulking surgery affected by genetics factors involved in angiogenesis and immunity pathways?
Presenter: Michele Bartoletti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3251 - Surrogate endpoint of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients (pts) treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT): Results of the CHIVA randomized phase II GINECO study
Presenter: Fabrice Lecuru
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3278 - Immune-Related Gene Expression Profiling after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) of Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma
Presenter: Luis Manso
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract