Abstract 5330
Background
No biomarkers predict efficacy of 5-FU for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A gene expression based drug response predictor (DRP) had been shown to predict benefit of 5-FU in the PETACC-3 cohort [1]. The current study aimed to validate the biomarker in a cohort of mCRC patients.
Methods
100 mCRC patients treated with 5-FU and leucovorin (FLV) at Sahlgrenska University Hospital from 1996-2013 had mRNA isolated from pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue and run on Affymetrix HG-133_Plus_2 microarray. The DRP is based on correlations of in-vitro cytotoxicity to 5-FU and consequently correlations to mRNA expression of 3.500 tumors and evaluated blinded to outcome. Primary outcome was progression-free-survival (PFS) at 3 years after treatment with FLV. In addition to variables in the table, right vs left colon cancer vs rectal cancer, age, gender and surgery elective or acute were assessed in the multivariate model. Treatments in the metastatic setting included oxaliplatin and irinotecan from year 2000. To correct for possible selection bias for FLV-treatment, we corrected for treatment year 2000 in the analysis plan.
Results
The DRP was able to predict benefit of FLV in patients treated after 2000 (n = 73) with a univariate hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.93, p = 0.023) for a 50% difference of the DRP. For patients treated before 2000 results were not statistically significant. In the Cox model including all variables, a DRP score of 90 corresponds to a 50% likelihood of 9 months PFS and a score of 32 corresponds to a PFS of 6 months.Table:
644P Multivariate analysis of PFS
Variable | Level | HR | 95%-CI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
DRP, difference of 50 | Treatment before 2000 | 1.24 | 0.52-3.03 | 0.63 |
Treatment after 2000 | 0.47 | 0.28-0.78 | 0.004 | |
Grade of differentiation | Medium + high vs low | 0.48 | 0.29-0.80 | 0.005 |
Mucinous vs low | 0.32 | 0.13-0.83 | 0.019 | |
Performance status | 2 vs 0-1 | 2.65 | 1.41-4.97 | 0.002 |
Conclusions
In patients treated with 5-FU after 2000 the DRP appears to predict benefit. There are no obvious reasons for the lack of prediction before 2000 but options include mRNA degradation, change in handling of samples, or the selection of older patients after 2000. [1] PLOS ONE; 11(5): e0155123.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Oncology Venture.
Funding
Oncology Venture.
Disclosure
I.K. Buhl: Full / Part-time employment, Shareholder (immediate family): Oncology Venture. B. Gustavsson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Isofol. I.J. Christensen: Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Oncology Venture. A. Hansen: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Oncology Venture. S. Knudsen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. P.B. Jensen: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Oncology Venture. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1049 - The Effect Of Multiple Interventions For Women At Risk For Cervical Cancer On Their Health Responsibility, Beliefs Regarding Cervical Cancer, And Having Screening: A Randomized Controlled Experiment
Presenter: Busra Altinel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1309 - Quantifying the Effects of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program on Cervical Cancer Mortality
Presenter: Nhung Bui
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1346 - Spread of tumor and adverse events after modified radical hysterectomy for FIGO Stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor diameter preoperatively estimated 2 cm or less: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG1101); exploratory analysis before primary analysis.
Presenter: Takahide Arimoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5352 - Impact of Combined Interstitial and Intracavitary Brachytherapy in locally advanced Cervical cancer: A Survival and toxicity profile assessment
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2049 - Chemoradiotherapy response prediction model by proteomic expressional profiling in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
Presenter: Chel Hun Choi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1923 - Disparities starting adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer in the international, academic, randomised, phase 3 OUTBACK trial (ANZGOG 0902, RTOG 1174, NRG 0274)
Presenter: Linda Mileshkin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3284 - Primary results from CECILIA, a global single-arm phase 2 study evaluating bevacizumab (BEV), carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) for advanced cervical cancer (aCC)
Presenter: Andres Redondo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
843 - Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PD-L1 in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
Presenter: Xiaobin Gu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1020 - Clinical impact of molecular profiling of cervical cancer (CC) patients (pts) in a dedicated Phase I (P1) unit
Presenter: Mariana Scaranti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
872 - Comparative proteomic profiles of cervical cancer and paried paracancerous tissue and the potential effects of DUSP7 over-expression through inhibiting RAS pathway on the biological characteristics of human cervical cancer cell line SIHA
Presenter: Xuan Jiang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract