Abstract 3120
Background
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized advanced melanoma care. Despite major improvements in survival, many patients do not derive long-term benefit and treatment could cause severe side-effects. Since several new (combination) therapies are or will become available, early prediction of non-responsiveness (NR) to anti-PD-1 monotherapy becomes relevant in order to enable early switch to next line (combination) treatment and avoid nonsensical care.
Methods
Advanced melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab (PEM) who started PEM between June 2014 and August 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. S100 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were routinely determined prior to initiation of PEM and every 3-weeks during treatment. NR to treatment was defined as progressive disease or death at 6 months after start of PEM. Biomarker response characteristic (BReC) plots were obtained and LDH and S100 response cut-offs were determined based on two criteria: specificity for NR > 95% and feasibility to use in clinical practice. Next, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were generated per follow-up time point (week 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15).
Results
166 advanced melanoma patients were included. The BReC analyses showed clear relations between an early (week 3 to 15) increase in tumor biomarker and NR. An increase of > 50% in LDH or a > 100% increase in S100 above the upper limit of normal compared to baseline at any follow-up interval was determined as criterion to positively test for NR. Obtained specificity ranged from 0.97-0.98 and the positive predictive value ranged from 0.92-0.96 for the studied follow-up intervals. Obtained sensitivity for detecting non-responsiveness ranged from 0.25 (95% CI; 0.16-0.35) at 3 weeks of follow-up to 0.35 (95% CI; 0.24-0.47) at 12 weeks of follow-up.
Conclusions
An early increase in S100 and/or LDH are strong parameters for non-responsiveness to PD-1 blockade in advanced melanoma. Prospective confirmation is needed before clinical implementation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Funding
Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Disclosure
E.A. Rozeman: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: NanoString; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD. J.V. van Thienen: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. J.B.A.G. Haanen: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: AZ/MedImmune; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Immunocore; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Neon Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Celsius; Advisory / Consultancy: Seattle Genetics; Advisory / Consultancy: Gadet. C.U. Blank: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly ; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: GenMab; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoString; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5218 - Elevated driver mutational burden or number of perturbed pathways and poor response to abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Presenter: Bram De Laere
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2452 - High proportion of multiple KRAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA and tumor tissue of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Min Kyeong Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3328 - Biological difference of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in patients (pts) with somatic vs. germline BRCA1/2-mutated advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing analysis in the GOZILA study
Presenter: Yasuyuki Kawamoto
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3022 - Cell-Free DNA to Detect Focal Versus Non-Focal MET Amplification in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: Combined Analysis from Japan and the United States
Presenter: Mishima Saori
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2833 - Presence of circulating tumor DNA in surgically resected renal cell carcinoma is associated with advanced disease and poor patient prognosis
Presenter: Andres Correa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1376 - Combined genomic and epigenomic assessment of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA) for cancer diagnosis and recurrence-risk assessment in early-stage lung cancer
Presenter: Junghee Lee
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4050 - DEMo: a prospective evaluation of a prognostic clinico-molecular composite score in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy.
Presenter: Arsela Prelaj
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4727 - Bespoke circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis as a predictive biomarker in solid tumor patients (pts) treated with single agent pembrolizumab (P)
Presenter: Cindy Yang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3662 - Dynamic changes in whole-genome cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to identify disease progression prior to imaging in advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Andrew Davis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3817 - Evaluation of Microsatellite Instability Testing Through cell-free DNA sequencing
Presenter: Shile Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract