Abstract 5989
Background
Following the rapid expansion in the use of checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) there has been increasing concern regarding the immune related adverse everts (irAE) associated with their usage. Whilst the efficacy is unquestionable the demand the management of patients receiving ICIs is having on oncological services is increasing and challenging in its differences to more traditional systemic anticancer therapies.
Methods
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre established an Immuno-oncology (IO) committee early in the usage of ICIs having recognised the need to have a dedicated service for the support and management of patients receiving ICIs. This included the establishment of a toxicity management service delivered a dedicated nursing team with clinician oversight alongside the development of standard operating procedures, supporting documentation, patient and educational resources.
Results
The service was implemented with the appointment of a lead immunotherapy nurse in August 2018 and a clinical nurse specialist in October 2018. These two nurses deliver the IO toxicity service with clinical support from two medical oncology consultants and a clinical fellow. Prior to the introduction of the service, between 2016-2018, there had been 8 fold increase in the admissions due to IO. Following the introduction of the service IO admission rates have fallen by 40% over the 7 month period the service has been in place compared to the preceding 7 month period (72 vs 120 admissions). Triage calls have fallen by 16.6% and face to face reviews reduced by 9.6%. This is despite a 20% (290 vs 240 patients) increase in the number of patients commencing on ICIs in the same periods. Development of toxicity team irAE outpatient management pathways for IV therapies and a immunosuppression monitoring service have also been established.
Conclusions
A dedicated immunotherapy toxicity service has reduced the acute admissions related to irAE and is starting to reduce the activity of oncology outpatient services despite ongoing increases in ICI indications, number of administrations and complexity of combination therapies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
This study was completed in part by a clinical research fellow (ACOB) who is currently funded by a Medical Research Council fellowship part funded by a UCB pharma, Roche, Eli Lilly and Novartis collaborative.
Disclosure
A.C. Olsson-Brown: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): MSD ; Research grant / Funding (self): UCB Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Eli Lilly. T. Guinan: Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb. S. Chow: Honoraria (self): Novartis. R. Lord: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca. J.J. Sacco: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: immunocore. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3489 - Overall Survival (OS) and Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS) in men with Biochemically Relapsed (BCR) Prostate Cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) managed with deferred Androgen Deprivation Treatment (ADT): A combined Johns Hopkins and CPDR study
Presenter: Catherine Marshall
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4606 - ARCHES – the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo (PBO) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): Post hoc analyses of high and low disease volume and risk groups
Presenter: Arnulf Stenzl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2975 - Updated survival analyses of a multicentric phase II randomized trial of docetaxel (D) plus enzalutamide (E) versus docetaxel (D) as first line chemotherapy for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (CHEIRON study).
Presenter: Orazio Caffo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2708 - Real-world analysis of patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving vs not receiving chemotherapy in the treatment sequence
Presenter: Alicia Morgans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2134 - Baseline fracture risk in men with prostate cancer starting the STAMPEDE trial
Presenter: Janet Brown
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3504 - Risk of falls and fractures in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with new hormonal agents – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Presenter: Rodrigo Coutinho Mariano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2342 - Pain progression at initiation of chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) is associated with a poor prognosis: a post-hoc analysis of FIRSTANA
Presenter: Nicolas Delanoy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5331 - Pain evaluation in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (Ra-223) in the PARABO observation study
Presenter: Holger Palmedo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2823 - Time to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and the risk of developing immune disorders
Presenter: Vincenza Conteduca
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1500 - Retrospective evaluation of neutropenic admission events in metastatic or high-risk hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients having docetaxel chemotherapy upfront or for castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in STAMPEDE
Presenter: Harriet Mintz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract