Abstract 2675
Background
The estimand framework requires a precise definition of the clinical question of interest (estimand) to account for “intercurrent” events, eg in RCC the appearance of second primary malignancies or the start of new therapy. Selection of the appropriate estimand will drive trial design and support discussions about relevant treatment effects, interpretation of study results, and the added value of drugs.
Methods
A cross-industry collaboration of statisticians and clinicians has worked on connecting estimand framework concepts to different applications. Data from previously reported phase 3, placebo-controlled studies S-TRAC (NCT00375674) and PROTECT (NCT01235962) will be used to illustrate the effect of different estimands on adjuvant treatment outcomes in RCC.
Results
Table shows the treatment outcomes for different estimands. Treatment outcomes were similar to the specified primary analysis irrespective of the clinical question asked; however, the studies were not powered to address each of these questions and not all reached statistical significance. The new framework clarifies that different analyses address different questions. The choice of the primary estimand impacts study design and may have regulatory implications. In RCC, considerations as to whether all second primary malignancies or non-disease related deaths should be considered disease-free survival events are required to further specify study objectives and to determine the events needed for the final analysis.Table:
980P
S-TRAC (N = 615) | PROTECT (N = 1538) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinical question of interest | Number of events | HR (95% CI) | Number of events | HR (95% CI) |
Specific primary analysis – does the drug improve disease-free survival if no patient received therapy? | 257 | 0.76 (0.59, 0.98) | 513 | 0.80 (0.68, 0.95) |
Does the drug improve disease-free survival and delay the start of new therapy? | 282 | 0.77 (0.61, 0.97) | N/A | N/A |
Does the drug improve disease-free survival regardless of whether the patient had received new therapy? | 289 | 0.81 (0.65, 1.02) | 519 | 0.81 (0.68, 0.96) |
Does the drug improve recurrence free survival in no patient had received new therapy? | 233 | 0.78 (0.60, 1.01) | N/A | N/A |
Conclusions
In S-TRAC and PROTECT, there are similar treatment effects irrespective of the estimand selected and the clinical question asked. However, this may not be the case in all trials and considerations should be given to the clinical question of interest during trial design. Dialogue between all stakeholders is required and physicians will play a key role in such discussions to select the appropriate estimand.
Clinical trial identification
NCT003756674 and NCT01235962.
Editorial acknowledgement
David Cope, PhD, of Engage Scientific Solutions and funded by Pfizer.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Pfizer.
Funding
Pfizer.
Disclosure
D.J. George: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Exelixis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Research grant / Funding (self): Genentech/Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (self): Celldex; Research grant / Funding (self): Acerta; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Innocrin Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb. M. Casey: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Pfizer. E. Degtyarev: Full / Part-time employment: Novartis. M.J. Lechuga Frean: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Pfizer. P. Aimone: Full / Part-time employment: Novartis. A. Ravaud: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme. R.J. Motzer: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech/Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): GlaxoSmithKline. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1291 - PD-L1 expression in uncommon EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and its response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Yun Fan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2171 - CCND1 Amplification Contributes to Immunosuppression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and the Association with a Poor Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Presenter: Chloe Huang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2624 - Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with sensitive genes mutation
Presenter: Hui-Juan Cui
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3494 - Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) kinetics as predictors of outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab (N).
Presenter: Audrey Simonaggio
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3964 - Predictive markers of checkpoint inhibitor activity in adult metastatic solid tumours
Presenter: Alexandra Pender
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3041 - Blood-based TMB (bTMB) correlates with tissue-based TMB (tTMB) in a multi-cancer Phase I IO Cohort
Presenter: Daniel Araujo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3910 - Analysis of Molecular Profile Complexities for Immunotherapy Decision Support
Presenter: Robert Dóczi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4836 - The Role of Tumor Neoantigens in the Differential Response to Immunotherapy (IO) in EGFR and BRAF Mutated Lung Cancers - Quantity or Quality?
Presenter: Katrina Case
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1929 - Impact of previous corticosteroid (CS) exposure on efficacy of Programmed Cell Death-(Ligand) 1 blockade in patients with advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a single Center retrospective analysis
Presenter: Fabrizio Nelli
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2601 - Comparison 18F-FDG-PET/CT criteria for prediction of therapy response and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with Ipilimumab and PD-1 inhibitors
Presenter: Sabrina Vari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract