Abstract 2157
Background
The molecular analysis of melanoma has improved our understanding of the disease. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Network proposed the molecular classification of melanoma in three subtypes: keratin-high, immune-high and membrane-low. However, this classification has not translated into therapeutic advances so far. Immunotherapy has contributed to improve survival, yet the mechanisms explaining differences in efficacy have not been elucidated. The aim of this study is to characterize the immune status of melanoma tumors through gene expression, and to analyze if these differences have an impact in the response to immunotherapy.
Methods
A probabilistic graphical model, followed by successive sparse k-means and consensus cluster analyses, was used to classify melanoma tumor samples from the TCGA cohort. Findings were translated into a cohort of patients treated with anti-PD1 antibodies (GSE78220, Hugo W et al) as a validation dataset.
Results
A probabilistic graphical model, including the 2,971 more variable genes from 472 melanoma samples from the TCGA dataset was built, and the resulting graph was processed to seek functional structures. Sparse k-means selected 119 genes. Gene ontology analysis showed that these genes were mainly related with immune processes. Immune genes split the population into two groups with different immune status. The so-called immune-high group included 232 patients (49%) and the immune-low group groups 238 patients (51%). The validation dataset GSE78220 provided mRNA expression in melanomas being treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies (28 biopsies belonging to 27 patients). The immune layer was translated to the new cohort by centroid method: 9 patients had immune-low tumors, whereas the remaining 18 had immune-high tumors. Kaplan Meier analysis using the clinical data from the GSE78220 cohort found a favorable response in patients with immune-low tumors (90% long-term survival).
Conclusions
We found a gene signature related to the tumor immune status that split the TCGA cohort in two groups. When applied to a cohort of patients treated with anti-PD1 antibodies, the group with immune-low tumors had 90% of long-term survival.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract