Abstract 1413
Background
Although recent advances in high-throughput technology have provided many insights into gastric cancer (GC), few reliable biomarkers for handling diffuse type GC are identified. Here, we aim to identify a prognostic and predictive signature predicting heterogeneous clinical courses of diffuse type GC.
Methods
We analysed RNA-seq based transcriptome data to identify a molecular signature in 150 gastric tissue samples including 107 diffuse type GCs. The predictive value of the signature was verified using other diffuse type GCs in three independent cohorts (n = 466). Various statistical methods, including log-rank and Cox regression analyses, were used to estimate an association between the signature and prognosis. The signature was also characterized by somatic variant assessments and tissue microarray analysis between diffuse type GC subtypes.
Results
Transcriptomic profiling revealed two distinct subtypes of diffuse type GC including intestinal-like (INT) and core diffuse type (COD) subgroups. We generated a signature, namely COD-signature, reflecting the best characteristics of subtypes. When estimating prognostic value in other cohorts, COD-signature showed a strong predictability and an independent clinical utility in diffuse type GC prognosis (hazard ratio = 2.058, 95% confidence interval = 1.53-2.77, P < 0.001; Table). Integrative mutation and gene expression analyses demonstrated that COD subtype was responsive to chemotherapy, whereas INT subtype showed responsiveness to immunotherapy with immune-check point inhibitor (ICI). Tissue microarray analysis showed practical utility of IGF1 and NXPE2 proteins for predicting diffuse type GC’s heterogeneity.Table: 155P
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival in diffuse type gastric cancer
Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | HR (95% CI) | P-value | n | HR (95% CI) | P-value | |
Age | 402 | 1.013 (1.001 - 1.025) | 0.037 | 402 | 1.02 (1.007 - 1.032) | 0.003 |
Gender (Male or Female) | 402 | 1.074 (0.805 - 1.433) | 0.625 | |||
AJCC Stage (I, II, III or IV) | 402 | 2.516 (2.088 - 3.032) | <0.001 | 2.67 (2.204 - 3.235) | <0.001 | |
Tumour site (cardia, body, antrum or whole) | 402 | 0.985 (0.777 - 1.248) | 0.9 | |||
COD-signature (INT or COD subtypes) | 402 | 1.675 (1.257 - 2.234) | <0.001 | 2.058 (1.53 - 2.766) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; INT, intestinal-like; COD, core diffuse type.
Conclusions
The COD-signature represents a promising diagnostic tool for the identification of diffuse type GC patients who would display different clinical behaviours as well as response to chemotherapy or ICI treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology Chungnam National University, College of Medicine Seoul National University, Faculty of Medicine.
Funding
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract