Abstract 4997
Background
Hospice care aims to optimize the quality of life of patients and their families in the last phase of life by diminishing physical, psychological, social and spiritual suffering. Expectations are associated with patient satisfaction. A theoretical framework was used, distinguishing expectations with respect to process, structure and outcomes. The aim of the study is to explore expectations of hospice care of future hospice patients.
Methods
A generic qualitative study was performed from January to July 2018. Eleven patients with a life expectancy <1 year (‘surprise question’) were enrolled. In addition, two patient advocates were included to gain a broader view on expectations. Semi structured interviews were transcribed verbatim, analyzed by 2 researchers independently and results were discussed in the research team.
Results
The participants covered a range in gender, age, spiritual beliefs, living area, primary diagnosis, phase of palliation and knowledge on the topic. Participants expect to be admitted to hospice when death was imminent and dying at home becomes impossible. They expect a homelike environment and the ability to continue living like being at home. Participants are sure that caregivers in hospice care are loving and trustworthy. Without doubt patients expect them to provide appropriate care and treatment with the skills and knowledge necessary.
Conclusions
Hospices have the responsibility to ensure nuanced and balanced information on hospice care in the Dutch society to set realistic expectations. Information about the possibilities and aims of hospice care, including short stay admissions, respite care and support at home in collaboration with primary caregivers should be widespread to ensure timely and appropriate hospice care for all patients in need.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
ZonMw.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract