Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Proffered Paper – CNS tumours

1688 - Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation in the REGOMA trial: a randomized, phase II clinical trial analyzing regorafenib activity in relapsed glioblastoma patients

Date

27 Sep 2019

Session

Proffered Paper – CNS tumours

Topics

Tumour Site

Central Nervous System Malignancies

Presenters

Mario Caccese

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v143-v158. 10.1093/annonc/mdz243

Authors

G. Lombardi1, P. Del Bianco2, A.A. Brandes3, M. Eoli4, R. Rudà5, T. Ibrahim6, I.R. Lolli7, A. Pace8, B. Daniele9, F. Pasqualetti10, S. Rizzato11, E. Bergo1, M. Caccese1, M. Padovan1, R. Soffietti5, G.L. De Salvo2, V. Zagonel1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV – IRCCS, 35128 - Padova/IT
  • 2 Clinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, 35128 - Padova/IT
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, AUSL-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, 40139 - Bologna/IT
  • 4 Molecolar Neuro-oncology Unit, Besta Institute, 20133 - Milano/IT
  • 5 Department Of Neuro-oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 - Torino/IT
  • 6 Medical Oncology Unit, IRST Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori - IRCCS, 47014 - Meldola/IT
  • 7 Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Saverio de Bellis, 70013 - Castellana Grotte, Bari/IT
  • 8 Neuroncology Unit, Regina Elena Cancer Institute - IRCCS, 00144 - Roma/IT
  • 9 Medical Oncology Unit, A.O.G. Rummo, 82100 - Benevento/IT
  • 10 Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, 56100 - Pisa/IT
  • 11 Department Of Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, 33100 - Udine/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1688

Background

REGOMA trial showed that regorafenib (REG) significantly improved OS and PFS in patients (pts) with relapsed GBM with respect to lomustine (LOM). REG showed a different toxicity profile compared to LOM. Here, we report final results of the HRQoL assessment, a secondary end point.

Methods

HRQoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and brain module (QLQ-BN20) administered before any MRI assessments, every 8 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) until disease progression. To evaluate treatment impact on HRQoL, questionnaires at progression were excluded. Mixed-effect linear models were fitted for each of the HRQOL domain to examine the change over progression-free time within and between arms. The models included the time of questionnaire assessment, the treatment group and their interaction, as fixed effects, and a compound symmetry covariance structure for the random effects. Differences of at least 10 points were classified as a clinically meaningful change. To correct for multiple comparisons and to avoid type I error, the level of significance was set at P = 0.01 (2-sided).

Results

Of 119 randomized pts, 117 participated in the HRQoL evaluation, and 114 had a baseline assessment (n = 56 REG; n = 58 LOM).

No statistically significant differences were observed in any generic or cancer specific domain during treatment in the REG and LOM arms, or between the two arms, except for the appetite loss scale which was significantly worse in PTS treated with REG (Global mean 14.7 (SD = 28.6) vs 7.6 (SD = 16.0); p = 0.0081). The rate of pts with a clinically meaningful worsening for appetite loss was not statistically different between the two arms (9 out of 24 and 0 out of 13 in the REG and LOM arm, respectively; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

In the REGOMA trial, HRQoL did not change during regorafenib treatment. Pts treated with regorafenib and lomustine reported no significant difference in HRQoL.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Giuseppe Lombardi.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.