Abstract 1688
Background
REGOMA trial showed that regorafenib (REG) significantly improved OS and PFS in patients (pts) with relapsed GBM with respect to lomustine (LOM). REG showed a different toxicity profile compared to LOM. Here, we report final results of the HRQoL assessment, a secondary end point.
Methods
HRQoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and brain module (QLQ-BN20) administered before any MRI assessments, every 8 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) until disease progression. To evaluate treatment impact on HRQoL, questionnaires at progression were excluded. Mixed-effect linear models were fitted for each of the HRQOL domain to examine the change over progression-free time within and between arms. The models included the time of questionnaire assessment, the treatment group and their interaction, as fixed effects, and a compound symmetry covariance structure for the random effects. Differences of at least 10 points were classified as a clinically meaningful change. To correct for multiple comparisons and to avoid type I error, the level of significance was set at P = 0.01 (2-sided).
Results
Of 119 randomized pts, 117 participated in the HRQoL evaluation, and 114 had a baseline assessment (n = 56 REG; n = 58 LOM).
No statistically significant differences were observed in any generic or cancer specific domain during treatment in the REG and LOM arms, or between the two arms, except for the appetite loss scale which was significantly worse in PTS treated with REG (Global mean 14.7 (SD = 28.6) vs 7.6 (SD = 16.0); p = 0.0081). The rate of pts with a clinically meaningful worsening for appetite loss was not statistically different between the two arms (9 out of 24 and 0 out of 13 in the REG and LOM arm, respectively; p = 0.02).
Conclusions
In the REGOMA trial, HRQoL did not change during regorafenib treatment. Pts treated with regorafenib and lomustine reported no significant difference in HRQoL.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Giuseppe Lombardi.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1638 - Efficacy and safety of ceritinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM): Results from the phase II, ASCEND-7 study
Presenter: Fabrice Barlesi
Session: Proffered Paper – CNS tumours
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
4648 - Prognostic role of the EANO ESMO classification of leptomeningeal metastases
Presenter: Emilie Le Rhun
Session: Proffered Paper – CNS tumours
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
4361 - A Phase 0/2 Clinical Trial of a CDK4/6 Inhibitor in Aggressive Meningioma Patients
Presenter: Nader Sanai
Session: Proffered Paper – CNS tumours
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1170 - Is Immuno-Oncology Therapy Effective in Hypermutator Glioblastomas with Somatic or Germline mutations ?
Presenter: Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka
Session: Proffered Paper – CNS tumours
Resources:
Abstract
Proffered Paper – CNS tumours - Invited Discussant 390O and 391O
Presenter: Paul Clement
Session: Proffered Paper – CNS tumours
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Proffered Paper – CNS tumours - Invited Discussant 392O, 393O and 394O
Presenter: Juan Sepulveda Sanchez
Session: Proffered Paper – CNS tumours
Resources:
Slides
Webcast