Abstract 6042
Background
Leadership is nursing is widely discussed and recognised as an important element in nursing services and indeed in health service development. Nurse leaders are in a prime position to facilitate and drive change within the healthcare setting. Nurse leaders can be role models within the workforce and integral in guiding and motivating teams to meet organisational goals. Whilst it often feels change within the clinical environment, occurs at a rapid rate or too frequently, resulting in a degree of change fatigue amongst nursing colleagues. Organisational change is often in response to advancements in medical knowledge, workforce demands or in this case, infrastructure change in response to increased demand upon a service. The authors work in a busy cancer centre, which delivers day case chemotherapy to approximately 130 patients a day. Delays resulting from patients attending day care in blocks of time resulted in bottle necks, meaning many faced long waits for their chemotherapy. A new scheduling system was implemented to focus booking patients based on chair availability and thus staggered more consistently across the day. The objective of the change was to improve patients’ attendance on our chemotherapy day unit, to prevent lengthy delays and streamline the process of delivering chemotherapy. The focus of this review, is how nursing leadership was instrumental in delivering change and how nurses are optimally positioned to drive change and manage projects in the healthcare setting.
Methods
A project was undertaken to implement a new electronic system for scheduling chemotherapy for a busy chemo day service. The project was led by oncology nurses within the service.
Results
The project outcome to implement a new electronic scheduling system was achieved in a timely manner. The project drivers did encounter some reticence, when colleagues faced new ways of working. Open and constant dialogue was maintained to ensure all stakeholders were fully apprised of the rationale for the change, the timescale and outcomes.
Conclusions
The importance of steady, intelligent leadership from nurses cannot be overestimated. Solidarity amongst nursing colleagues and allied health professionals is essential to optimise organisational efficacy and quality of care.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1908 - Androgen Receptor (AR) Aberrations in Patients (Pts) With Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mCSPC) Treated With Apalutamide (APA) Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in TITAN
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4058 - 68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies for molecular diagnostics in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients
Presenter: Anouk de Jong
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2226 - Spatial-Temporal Change in Quantitative Total Bone Imaging (QTBI) and Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Treated With Enzalutamide (ENZA)
Presenter: Glenn Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5795 - Efficacy of Enzalutamide in Hormone-sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Clinical Utility of 18F-Choline PET and Whole Body MRI.
Presenter: Susanne Osanto
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
899 - Urine extracellular vesicle GATA2 mRNA alone and in a multigene test predicts initial prostate biopsy result
Presenter: Jungreem Woo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3094 - Circulating tumor cell (CTC) genomic landscape in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) by single cell copy number analysis
Presenter: Vincenza Conteduca
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2527 - Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) count and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) response measures in metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with Docetaxel (Doc)
Presenter: Rebeca Lozano Mejorada
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6106 - Assessing the clinical relevance of drug–drug interactions (DDI) with darolutamide (DARO)
Presenter: Christian Zurth
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2237 - KEYNOTE-921: phase 3 study of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus docetaxel and prednisone for enzalutamide (enza)- or abiraterone (abi)-pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2241 - KEYNOTE-641: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Enzalutamide for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Julie Graff
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract