Abstract 4175
Background
EP-HG-NEC are rare malignancies with poor prognosis, mainly from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, although they may originate anywhere in the body due to the wide distribution of the neuroendocrine system. Platinum plus etoposide regimen (PE) is standard of care. Our goal was to characterise EP-HG-NEC at our institute, evaluate primary tumor location as prognostic factor and the effectiveness of PE as first-line (1L) therapy.
Methods
Records of patients (pts) diagnosed with EP-HG-NEC at a Portuguese terciary cancer center were reviewed retrospectively (January 2000-March 2019).
Results
Fifty-eight pts (52% males) identified: median (m) follow-up was 21 months (M) (range: 4-43); at diagnosis, m age was 61 years (range 30-85), 81% had ECOG performance status of 0-1, 83% were symptomatic, 64% had metastatic disease (70% with liver metastasis), 48% had Ki67 above 55%. Primary tumor location was GI in 27 pts (33% Esophagus, 19% colorectal, 15% pancreas), unknown (CUP) in 24 pts and genitourinary (GU) in 7 pts. For all EP-HG-NEC, m overall survival (OS) was 15,7M. Pts with CUP seemed to have a worse prognosis (mOS=8,5M), whereas GU and GI had a similar prognosis (mOS=19,2 and 18,7M, respectively) (p = 0.357).Thirty-nine pts (67%) got PE, 7 pts received a different chemotherapy (ChT) regimen and 9 pts got best supportive care (BSC) only. mPFS was 4,6M for PE group and 7,3M for other ChT regimen group (platinum alone, CAPTEM, 5FU-STZ) with no statistical significance (p = 0.547). mOS was 15,7M for PE group and 6,9M for BSC group (p = 0.54). With PE, 41% had grade 3 adverse events and no toxic deaths were reported. After 1L PE, 24 pts received a second L ChT, 50% with CAPTEM.
Conclusions
Considering the limited data available, this retrospective case series contributes to a better understanding of this entity. Primary tumor location tends to predict outcome. We hypothesised that delaying treatment initiation for CUP while searching for primary tumor might be related to worse outcomes. The outcomes of 1L PE suggest that other options might be needed as standard of care. EP-HG-NEC has prognostic heterogeneity, multi-center studies are needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2780 - A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study of durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers: TOPAZ-1
Presenter: Do-Youn Oh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4413 - Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF trial
Presenter: Ghassan Abou-Alfa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4710 - Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5509 - A Randomized Controlled, Open label, Adaptive Phase-3 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of EndoTAG-1 Plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine alone in Patients with Measurable Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Failed on FOLFIRINOX Treatment (NCT03126435)
Presenter: Li-Tzong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1463 - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction – Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.
Presenter: Sylvie Lorenzen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2392 - GLOW: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Zolbetuximab + CAPOX Compared With Placebo + CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Patients With CLD18.2⁺/HER2⁻ Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Manish Shah
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5217 - PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a comparative randomized phase II trial
Presenter: Rosine Guimbaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1726 - Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel + ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy: WJOG10617G/P-SELECT
Presenter: Kenro Hirata
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2279 - FRONTiER: A Feasibility Trial of Nivolumab With Neoadjuvant CF or DCF Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4912 - A phase Ib/II study of AK104, a PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With mXELOX as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jiafu Ji
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract