Abstract 1755
Background
PAN26 was developed as a supplement to the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess pancreatic cancer–specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues. Despite its use in clinical trials, PAN26 MID has not been established. In undertaking the most comprehensive evaluation to date of PAN26’s measurement properties in patients with surgically resected pancreatic cancer receiving adjuvant therapy, we used distribution-based minimum detectable change (MDC) and anchor-based methods to determine PAN26 scale MIDs using the data collected during the Adjuvant Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (APACT).
Methods
PAN26 and QLQ-C30 scores were assessed in 12-week intervals at screening (BL), middle and end of treatment, and up to 2.5 years of follow-up. MDC values were calculated via BL standard deviation (SD) and reliability-biased standard error of measurement approaches. Anchor-based values were determined via a linear mixed model in which QLQ-C30 overall health (OH; Item 29) served as a serial patient global impression of severity anchor for predicting PAN26 scores. Pattern-mixture models (PMM) were fit to assess the impact of attrition on estimates.
Results
MDC values were in the 12 to 15 range (Table). These findings were consistent with SD-based values inferred from earlier studies, although our results extended to standalone items. Anchor-based MIDs were almost twice as sensitive as MDC, with values in the 5 to 9 range (PMM values almost identical). Anchor values could not be inferred for the PAN26 bowel, hepatic, and healthcare scales and gas item due to their low (r < 0.30) correlation with OH.Table:
687P PAN26 anchor (QLQ-C30 overall health) and distribution-derived MID
Scale/Item | Anchor | Distribution | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | SE | 1/2 BLSD | SEM | |
Altered bowel habit | –a | 12.5 | 11.8 | |
Body image | 6.4 | 0.3 | 13.1 | 13.5 |
Digestive symptoms | 6.0 | 0.3 | 13.4 | 16.2 |
Hepatic | – a | 7.6 | 11.4 | |
Pancreatic pain | 5.6 | 0.2 | 9.7 | 9.7 |
Satisfaction with health care | – a | 12.1 | 15.3 | |
Sexual dysfunction | 5.4 | 0.4 | 17.3 | 19.7 |
Bloated | 4.9 | 0.3 | 12.8 | 15.9 |
Dry mouth | 5.1 | 0.3 | 13.4 | 15.6 |
Gas | – a | 14.5 | 16.2 | |
Indigestion | 4.8 | 0.3 | 12.8 | 15.7 |
Limited activities | 8.0 | 0.3 | 15.4 | 21.7 |
Low weight | 5.3 | 0.3 | 14.8 | 20.5 |
Taste different | 7.5 | 0.3 | 13.6 | 19.7 |
Troubled by tx adverse events | 8.8 | 0.3 | 12.6 | 15.8 |
Weak arms/legs | 9.1 | 0.3 | 13.1 | 15.7 |
Worried about future health | 6.3 | 0.3 | 15.5 | 16.3 |
BLSD, baseline standard deviation; SE, standard error; SEM, standard error of measurement (based on intraclass correlation).
aLow r (< 0.3) with overall health.
Conclusions
The MID estimates for PAN26 subscales can help clinicians and researchers interpret the changes in HRQoL and determine sample sizes in the design of future clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Pharmerit International.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Celgene Corporation.
Disclosure
M. Reni: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Personal Fees: Celgene, Baxalta, Shire, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novocure, Novartis, AstraZeneca. J. Braverman: Full / Part-time employment: Celgene Corporation. T. Macarulla Mercade: Honoraria (self): Roche, Sanofi, Tesaro, Shire, Genzyme; Advisory / Consultancy: Baxalta, Celgene, H3B, QED, Shire; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene, Sanofi/Aventis, Shire; Research grant / Funding (self): Agios, Aslan, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Genetech, Hallozyme, Immunomedics, Lilly, Merimarck, Millennium, Novartis, Novocure, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer, H3B, Merck, Sanofi. D. Oh: Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck Serono, Bayer, Taiho, ASLAN, Halozyme, Zymeworks; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Novartis, Array, Eli Lilly. H. Riess: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Personal Fees: Celgene, Roche, Shire. M.A. Tempero: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie, Advance Medical, BioPharm Communications, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Ignyta, Pharmacyslics, Pharmcyte Biotech, Tocagen; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, CPRIT, Immunovia; Research grant / Funding (institution): Halozyme. B. Lu: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Celgene Corporation. J. Marcus: Full / Part-time employment: Pharmerit international; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Celgene Corporation. N. Joshi: Full / Part-time employment: Pharmerit International; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene Corporation. M. Botterman: Honoraria (institution): Celgene, Bayer, Daiichi, BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4413 - Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF trial
Presenter: Ghassan Abou-Alfa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4710 - Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5509 - A Randomized Controlled, Open label, Adaptive Phase-3 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of EndoTAG-1 Plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine alone in Patients with Measurable Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Failed on FOLFIRINOX Treatment (NCT03126435)
Presenter: Li-Tzong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1463 - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction – Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.
Presenter: Sylvie Lorenzen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2392 - GLOW: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Zolbetuximab + CAPOX Compared With Placebo + CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Patients With CLD18.2⁺/HER2⁻ Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Manish Shah
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5217 - PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a comparative randomized phase II trial
Presenter: Rosine Guimbaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1726 - Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel + ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy: WJOG10617G/P-SELECT
Presenter: Kenro Hirata
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2279 - FRONTiER: A Feasibility Trial of Nivolumab With Neoadjuvant CF or DCF Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4912 - A phase Ib/II study of AK104, a PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With mXELOX as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jiafu Ji
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3780 - Perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone in patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: DANTE, a randomized, open-label phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO and the SAKK.
Presenter: Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract