Abstract 2333
Background
The emergence of ICIs has modified the treatment of many types of cancers. However, efficacy and safety data of such agents (anti PD-1/anti PD-L1) are cruelly missing in elderly patients ⩾ 80 year-old.
Methods
A retrospective monocentric study was conducted between April 2015 and April 2019 in all ⩾ 80 year-old ICIs-treated patients, as a part of a clinical trial or standard of care. Patients/disease characteristics were collected using electronic medical records. Clinical response was assessed according to iRECIST criteria; survival was estimated according to Kaplan-Meier method and toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v 4.0.
Results
Of the 415 patients who received an ICI, 42 (10.1%) were aged ⩾ 80 years (median: 84; range: 80-93). The most represented tumour types were NSCLC (45.2%), renal cell carcinoma (30.9%) and bladder carcinoma (16.7%). 92.9% were stage IV. ICIs were given as first-line therapy in 7 patients (16.7%) and as second-line or beyond in 35 patients (83.3%). 29 patients had nivolumab, 10 patients had pembrolizumab and 3 had atezolizumab. ICIs were given mostly as monotherapy (97.6%). A median of 7.5 doses were administered (range: 1-37). Of the 42 patients, 40.5% were PS ⩾ 2 and 88.1% had impaired G8 score. Mean Charlson Index was 3 (range: 0-6), polypharmacy was present in 26 cases and 35.7% had an albumin level < 35g/L (Mean 33.3; range: 22-44). The Objective Response Rate was 11.9% and the Disease Control Rate was 31%. The median progression-free survival was 5 months [95% CI: 2-10] and the median overall survival was 9 months [95% CI: 6-21]. 26 patients died during the treatment, 16 are still alive; 1 with complete response, 8 stable disease and 7 progressed. All-grade adverse events occurred in 100% of patients, mostly Grade 1 fatigue and anorexia. Immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) occurred in 76.2%, most of them were common and mild; dyspnea, thyroïditis, rash and diarrhea. 9 severe IrAEs occurred; colitis, pneumonitis, rash and arthralgia. Reasons for off therapy included progressive disease (n = 23; 54.8%), adverse effects (n = 5; 11.9%) and death (n = 6; 14.3%).
Conclusions
ICIs appear to be an acceptable treatment option for octogenarian patients, with manageable toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Mebarki Soraya.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
E. Fabre: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Merck. S. Oudard: Research grant / Funding (self): Boehringer; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfize; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi. E. Paillaud: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Honoraria (self): Servier; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3489 - Overall Survival (OS) and Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS) in men with Biochemically Relapsed (BCR) Prostate Cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) managed with deferred Androgen Deprivation Treatment (ADT): A combined Johns Hopkins and CPDR study
Presenter: Catherine Marshall
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4606 - ARCHES – the role of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo (PBO) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): Post hoc analyses of high and low disease volume and risk groups
Presenter: Arnulf Stenzl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2975 - Updated survival analyses of a multicentric phase II randomized trial of docetaxel (D) plus enzalutamide (E) versus docetaxel (D) as first line chemotherapy for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) (CHEIRON study).
Presenter: Orazio Caffo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2708 - Real-world analysis of patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving vs not receiving chemotherapy in the treatment sequence
Presenter: Alicia Morgans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2134 - Baseline fracture risk in men with prostate cancer starting the STAMPEDE trial
Presenter: Janet Brown
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3504 - Risk of falls and fractures in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with new hormonal agents – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Presenter: Rodrigo Coutinho Mariano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2342 - Pain progression at initiation of chemotherapy in metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) is associated with a poor prognosis: a post-hoc analysis of FIRSTANA
Presenter: Nicolas Delanoy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5331 - Pain evaluation in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (Ra-223) in the PARABO observation study
Presenter: Holger Palmedo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2823 - Time to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and the risk of developing immune disorders
Presenter: Vincenza Conteduca
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1500 - Retrospective evaluation of neutropenic admission events in metastatic or high-risk hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients having docetaxel chemotherapy upfront or for castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in STAMPEDE
Presenter: Harriet Mintz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract