Abstract 4463
Background
Irinotecan is widely used, but also known for its severe toxicities neutropenia and diarrhea. Based on preclinical data, combined caloric and protein restriction (CCPR) might improve treatment tolerability without impairing antitumor effect. Therefore, we studied the influence of CCPR on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity.
Methods
In this cross-over trial, patients with liver metastases of solid tumors were included and randomized to treatment with irinotecan preceded by 5 days of CCPR (∼30% caloric and ∼70% protein restriction) during the 1st cycle and a 2nd cycle preceded by a normal diet (ND) or vice versa. During both cycles, 24-hours blood sampling was performed and 24-26 hours after infusion biopsies of both healthy liver (HL) and liver metastasis (LM) were taken. Primary endpoint was the relative difference in geometric means for the active metabolite SN-38 concentration in HL, as analyzed by a linear mixed model. Secondary endpoints included irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations in LM, plasma area under the curve (AUC0-24h), and toxicity.
Results
Interpatient variability (n = 19) in tissue irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations was high, showing no significant differences in irinotecan (+16.8%, 95% CI: -9.7-51.1%, P = 0.227) and SN-38 (+9.8%, 95% CI: -16.4-44.2%, P = 0.48) concentrations between CCPR and ND in HL, as well as in LM (irinotecan: -38.8%, 90% CI: -59.3:-7.9%, P = 0.05 and SN-38: -13.8%, 90% CI:-40.7-25.4%, P = 0.50). CCPR increased irinotecan plasma AUC0-24h with 7.1% (95% CI: 0.3-14.5%, P = 0.04) compared to ND, while the SN-38 plasma AUC0-24h increased with 50.3% (95% CI: 34.6-67.9%, P < 0.001). CCPR was well tolerated with low incidence of grade ≥3 therapy related toxicity. Grade ≥3 toxicity was not increased during CCPR vs ND (P = 0.69). No difference was seen in neutropenia grade ≥3 (47% vs 32% P = 0.38), diarrhea grade ≥3 (5% vs 21% P = 0.25), febrile neutropenia (5% vs 16% P = 0.50) and hospitalization (11% vs 21% P = 0.634) during CCPR vs ND.
Conclusions
CCPR resulted in a dramatically increased plasma SN-38 exposure, while toxicity did not change. CCPR did not result in altered irinotecan and SN-38 exposure in HL and LM. CCPR might therefore potentially improve the therapeutic window in patients treated with irinotecan.
Clinical trial identification
Netherlands Trial Register NL5624 (NTR5731) release date: 2016-03-04.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
A.H.J. Mathijssen.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (institution): Servier; Honoraria (institution): Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4822 - Efficiacy of different nutritional intervention on nutritional status and quality of life for local advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a prospective clinical trial
Presenter: Yuan-yuan Chen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2628 - Apatinib in treating patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Presenter: Changjuan Tao
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4887 - Impact of tumor site and adjuvant radiotherapy on survival of adenoid cystic carcinoma: a SEER database analysis
Presenter: Jason Tasoulas
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2634 - Efficacy and safety of anlotinib for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland carcinomas
Presenter: Wen Jiang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3568 - ACCURACY a phase (P) 2 trial of AL101, a pan-Notch inhibitor, in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) patients (pts) with Notch activating mutations (Notch act mut): preliminary safety and efficacy data.
Presenter: Renata Ferrarotto
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
683 - Pathologic Staging Changes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma—Stage Migration and Implications for Adjuvant Treatment
Presenter: Zain Husain
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
563 - Expression of immune response biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in irradiated area
Presenter: Carole Pflumio
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4030 - HLA-Ligandome analysis reveals target antigens of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Simon Laban
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2979 - Topographical distribution of sentinel lymph nodes in early tongue squamous cell carcinomas
Presenter: Hiroyuki Goda
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3517 - Role of follow-up (FU) FDG-PET/CT (FU-FDG-PET/CT) in patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-HNSCC) treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT), either concurrent (CRT) or sequential (ST).
Presenter: Bert Van Den Heuvel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract