Abstract 4463
Background
Irinotecan is widely used, but also known for its severe toxicities neutropenia and diarrhea. Based on preclinical data, combined caloric and protein restriction (CCPR) might improve treatment tolerability without impairing antitumor effect. Therefore, we studied the influence of CCPR on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity.
Methods
In this cross-over trial, patients with liver metastases of solid tumors were included and randomized to treatment with irinotecan preceded by 5 days of CCPR (∼30% caloric and ∼70% protein restriction) during the 1st cycle and a 2nd cycle preceded by a normal diet (ND) or vice versa. During both cycles, 24-hours blood sampling was performed and 24-26 hours after infusion biopsies of both healthy liver (HL) and liver metastasis (LM) were taken. Primary endpoint was the relative difference in geometric means for the active metabolite SN-38 concentration in HL, as analyzed by a linear mixed model. Secondary endpoints included irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations in LM, plasma area under the curve (AUC0-24h), and toxicity.
Results
Interpatient variability (n = 19) in tissue irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations was high, showing no significant differences in irinotecan (+16.8%, 95% CI: -9.7-51.1%, P = 0.227) and SN-38 (+9.8%, 95% CI: -16.4-44.2%, P = 0.48) concentrations between CCPR and ND in HL, as well as in LM (irinotecan: -38.8%, 90% CI: -59.3:-7.9%, P = 0.05 and SN-38: -13.8%, 90% CI:-40.7-25.4%, P = 0.50). CCPR increased irinotecan plasma AUC0-24h with 7.1% (95% CI: 0.3-14.5%, P = 0.04) compared to ND, while the SN-38 plasma AUC0-24h increased with 50.3% (95% CI: 34.6-67.9%, P < 0.001). CCPR was well tolerated with low incidence of grade ≥3 therapy related toxicity. Grade ≥3 toxicity was not increased during CCPR vs ND (P = 0.69). No difference was seen in neutropenia grade ≥3 (47% vs 32% P = 0.38), diarrhea grade ≥3 (5% vs 21% P = 0.25), febrile neutropenia (5% vs 16% P = 0.50) and hospitalization (11% vs 21% P = 0.634) during CCPR vs ND.
Conclusions
CCPR resulted in a dramatically increased plasma SN-38 exposure, while toxicity did not change. CCPR did not result in altered irinotecan and SN-38 exposure in HL and LM. CCPR might therefore potentially improve the therapeutic window in patients treated with irinotecan.
Clinical trial identification
Netherlands Trial Register NL5624 (NTR5731) release date: 2016-03-04.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
A.H.J. Mathijssen.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (institution): Servier; Honoraria (institution): Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3611 - Phase II trial of SM 88 in Non-Metastatic Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Presenter: Benjamin Gartrell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2492 - A phase 1 study of Ad5 PSA/MUC-1/Brachyury Vaccine in Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Marijo Bilusic
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3142 - Multicenter Phase I Trial of a DNA Vaccine Encoding the Androgen Receptor Ligand Binding Domain (pTVG-AR, MVI-118) in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Presenter: Douglas McNeel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4327 - Impact of germline mutations in Homologous Recombination (HR) genes on the response to Radium-223 for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Elena Castro
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3600 - Serum biomarkers of bone metabolism in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with Radium-223 (Ra223): Results from a prospective multicentre study
Presenter: Nuria Romero Laorden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3742 - Prognostic value of tumor suppression genes (TP53, PTEN, Rb) in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Miguel Gonzalez Velez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2643 - Germline sequencing of advanced prostate cancer patients in the BARCODE2 trial
Presenter: Sarah Benafif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4349 - Impact of treatment sequence in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): data from the prospective PROREPAIR-B study.
Presenter: Carlo Cattrini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3301 - Implications of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in Androgen Related-Genes in Outcome of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with Abiraterone (Abi) and Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Isabel Aragon
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2275 - Activating mutations in AKT1/PIK3CA are associated with poor clinical outcomes in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC)
Presenter: Simon Fu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract