Abstract 2767
Background
CELESTIAL (NCT01908426), a phase 3 study in patients with aHCC who progressed on sorafenib (≤2 previous systemic treatments allowed), demonstrated improved survival and progression-free survival with cabozantinib over placebo. CELESTIAL was stopped early for benefit at the second interim analysis (hazard ratio for death in overall population, 0.76 [95% confidence interval 0.63–0.92; p = 0.005] resulting in short follow-up for some patients). This retrospective analysis compared patient experience of three discrete health states in patients receiving second-line cabozantinib vs placebo in CELESTIAL: time with grade 3/4 toxicity before progression (TOX); time without grade 3/4 toxicity before progression (TWiST); and survival time after progression or relapse (REL).
Methods
Overall, 495 patients in CELESTIAL had sorafenib as the only prior therapy (cabozantinib, 331; placebo, 164). For each patient, times spent in TOX, TWiST and REL were calculated. Toxicities were based on reported adverse events. Patients censored prior to progression or death (32%) accrued time in each health state up to that date.
Results
Second-line cabozantinib was associated with significantly longer mean TOX (49.8 vs 9.8 days, p < 0.0001), and also TWiST (110.9 vs 78.1 days, p = 0.001) than placebo; survival times after progression (REL) were similar; (Table). Analyses based on all patients in CELESTIAL (N = 707) or limited to those with ≥100 days of follow-up (regardless of whether they had a progression event prior to that time) resulted in numerically different estimates for each health state, but no qualitative differences in findings.Table:
754P
Health state | Cabozantinib (N = 331) Mean days (95% CI) | Placebo (N = 164) Mean days (95% CI) | Difference cabozantinib - placebo Mean days (95% CI; t test) |
---|---|---|---|
TOX | 49.8 (39.2–60.3) | 9.8 (2.6–17.0) | 40.0 (27.3–52.7; p < 0.0001) |
TWiST | 110.9 (96.7–125.2) | 78.1 (64.7–91.5) | 32.8 (13.3–52.3; p = 0.001) |
REL | 174.5 (152.5–196.5) | 178.6 (144.1–213.0) | -4.1 (-43.5–35.4; p = 0.85) |
CI, confidence interval; REL, survival time after progression/relapse; TOX, time with a grade 3/4 toxicity before progression; TWiST, time without disease symptoms and grade 3/4 toxicity
Conclusions
Patients with aHCC receiving second-line cabozantinib after sorafenib spent significantly more time without disease symptoms and toxicity than those receiving placebo, despite an increase in days with grade 3/4 toxicity before progression.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01908426.
Editorial acknowledgement
Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK for providing editorial support, which was sponsored by Ipsen, Abingdon, UK in accordance with Good Publication Practice guidelines.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Ipsen.
Funding
Ipsen.
Disclosure
N. Freemantle: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Biogen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Yesaro; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Allergan; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: PTC; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca. G.K. Abou-Alfa: Advisory / Consultancy: 3DMedcare; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Agions; Advisory / Consultancy: Alignmed; Advisory / Consultancy: Antengene; Advisory / Consultancy: Aptus; Advisory / Consultancy: Aslan; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Beigene; Advisory / Consultancy: Bioline; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Boston Scientific; Advisory / Consultancy: Bridgebio; Advisory / Consultancy: Carsgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Casi; Advisory / Consultancy: Cipla; Advisory / Consultancy: Cytom X; Advisory / Consultancy: Daiichi. A. Cheng: Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eisai; Honoraria (self): Merck Sharp Dohme; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: IQVIA; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer Schering Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Exelixis; Advisory / Consultancy: Nucleix Ltd.; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen Taiwan. R.K. Kelley: Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech/ Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Agios; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Adaptimmune; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): QED; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Medimmune; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho. V. Valcheva: Full / Part-time employment: Ipsen. F. Benzaghou: Full / Part-time employment: Ipsen. P. Mollon: Full / Part-time employment: Ipsen.
Resources from the same session
3905 - Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Krittiya Korphaisarn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract