Abstract 2767
Background
CELESTIAL (NCT01908426), a phase 3 study in patients with aHCC who progressed on sorafenib (≤2 previous systemic treatments allowed), demonstrated improved survival and progression-free survival with cabozantinib over placebo. CELESTIAL was stopped early for benefit at the second interim analysis (hazard ratio for death in overall population, 0.76 [95% confidence interval 0.63–0.92; p = 0.005] resulting in short follow-up for some patients). This retrospective analysis compared patient experience of three discrete health states in patients receiving second-line cabozantinib vs placebo in CELESTIAL: time with grade 3/4 toxicity before progression (TOX); time without grade 3/4 toxicity before progression (TWiST); and survival time after progression or relapse (REL).
Methods
Overall, 495 patients in CELESTIAL had sorafenib as the only prior therapy (cabozantinib, 331; placebo, 164). For each patient, times spent in TOX, TWiST and REL were calculated. Toxicities were based on reported adverse events. Patients censored prior to progression or death (32%) accrued time in each health state up to that date.
Results
Second-line cabozantinib was associated with significantly longer mean TOX (49.8 vs 9.8 days, p < 0.0001), and also TWiST (110.9 vs 78.1 days, p = 0.001) than placebo; survival times after progression (REL) were similar; (Table). Analyses based on all patients in CELESTIAL (N = 707) or limited to those with ≥100 days of follow-up (regardless of whether they had a progression event prior to that time) resulted in numerically different estimates for each health state, but no qualitative differences in findings.Table:
754P
Health state | Cabozantinib (N = 331) Mean days (95% CI) | Placebo (N = 164) Mean days (95% CI) | Difference cabozantinib - placebo Mean days (95% CI; t test) |
---|---|---|---|
TOX | 49.8 (39.2–60.3) | 9.8 (2.6–17.0) | 40.0 (27.3–52.7; p < 0.0001) |
TWiST | 110.9 (96.7–125.2) | 78.1 (64.7–91.5) | 32.8 (13.3–52.3; p = 0.001) |
REL | 174.5 (152.5–196.5) | 178.6 (144.1–213.0) | -4.1 (-43.5–35.4; p = 0.85) |
CI, confidence interval; REL, survival time after progression/relapse; TOX, time with a grade 3/4 toxicity before progression; TWiST, time without disease symptoms and grade 3/4 toxicity
Conclusions
Patients with aHCC receiving second-line cabozantinib after sorafenib spent significantly more time without disease symptoms and toxicity than those receiving placebo, despite an increase in days with grade 3/4 toxicity before progression.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01908426.
Editorial acknowledgement
Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK for providing editorial support, which was sponsored by Ipsen, Abingdon, UK in accordance with Good Publication Practice guidelines.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Ipsen.
Funding
Ipsen.
Disclosure
N. Freemantle: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Biogen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Yesaro; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Allergan; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: PTC; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca. G.K. Abou-Alfa: Advisory / Consultancy: 3DMedcare; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Agions; Advisory / Consultancy: Alignmed; Advisory / Consultancy: Antengene; Advisory / Consultancy: Aptus; Advisory / Consultancy: Aslan; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Beigene; Advisory / Consultancy: Bioline; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Boston Scientific; Advisory / Consultancy: Bridgebio; Advisory / Consultancy: Carsgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Casi; Advisory / Consultancy: Cipla; Advisory / Consultancy: Cytom X; Advisory / Consultancy: Daiichi. A. Cheng: Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eisai; Honoraria (self): Merck Sharp Dohme; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: IQVIA; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer Schering Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Exelixis; Advisory / Consultancy: Nucleix Ltd.; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen Taiwan. R.K. Kelley: Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech/ Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Agios; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Adaptimmune; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): QED; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Medimmune; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho. V. Valcheva: Full / Part-time employment: Ipsen. F. Benzaghou: Full / Part-time employment: Ipsen. P. Mollon: Full / Part-time employment: Ipsen.
Resources from the same session
1049 - The Effect Of Multiple Interventions For Women At Risk For Cervical Cancer On Their Health Responsibility, Beliefs Regarding Cervical Cancer, And Having Screening: A Randomized Controlled Experiment
Presenter: Busra Altinel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1309 - Quantifying the Effects of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program on Cervical Cancer Mortality
Presenter: Nhung Bui
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1346 - Spread of tumor and adverse events after modified radical hysterectomy for FIGO Stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor diameter preoperatively estimated 2 cm or less: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG1101); exploratory analysis before primary analysis.
Presenter: Takahide Arimoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5352 - Impact of Combined Interstitial and Intracavitary Brachytherapy in locally advanced Cervical cancer: A Survival and toxicity profile assessment
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2049 - Chemoradiotherapy response prediction model by proteomic expressional profiling in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
Presenter: Chel Hun Choi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1923 - Disparities starting adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer in the international, academic, randomised, phase 3 OUTBACK trial (ANZGOG 0902, RTOG 1174, NRG 0274)
Presenter: Linda Mileshkin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3284 - Primary results from CECILIA, a global single-arm phase 2 study evaluating bevacizumab (BEV), carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) for advanced cervical cancer (aCC)
Presenter: Andres Redondo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
843 - Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PD-L1 in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
Presenter: Xiaobin Gu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1020 - Clinical impact of molecular profiling of cervical cancer (CC) patients (pts) in a dedicated Phase I (P1) unit
Presenter: Mariana Scaranti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
872 - Comparative proteomic profiles of cervical cancer and paried paracancerous tissue and the potential effects of DUSP7 over-expression through inhibiting RAS pathway on the biological characteristics of human cervical cancer cell line SIHA
Presenter: Xuan Jiang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract