Abstract 2293
Background
Antacids (AA) are commonly used in the elderly population. Proton pump inhibitors and other drugs to neutralize the gastral pH level and to prevent gastroesophageal reflux are suspected to reduce the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. To our knowledge, the effect of AA therapy on SUN efficacy has not been investigated in a real-world mRCC population yet.
Methods
STAR-TOR is a German multicenter registry for pts with mRCC (NCT00700258) which was amended to include SUN pts in June 2010 with regulatory and ethic committee’s approval. Objectives are the evaluation of the safety profile, the tolerability and anti-tumor activity of SUN. Here, we present data on the impact of AA therapy on the therapeutic efficacy of SUN in first-line mRCC pts.
Results
From July 2010 to February 2019, 109 active study sites recruited 550 first line SUN pts. 378 (69%)of these were reported to use AA therapy at baseline, 172 (31%) were AA non-users. Characteristics (AA yes/no): male 66.1/75.1%, median age 67.0/68.0 years, clear cell component: 81.4/81.5%. For all 550 pts, most common drug-related toxicities (incidence ≥ 15%) of any grade were gastrointestinal disorders (38.0%), general disorders including fatigue, mucosal inflammation and edema (29.1%), skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders including hand-foot syndrome (22.7%), nervous system disorders, and blood and lymphatic system disorders (both 19.1%). There was no relevant difference in adverse event rates between AA users and non-users. Efficacy (AA yes vs no): overall response rate 15.1 vs 27.4% (n = 426, p = 0.007), PFS 5.8 vs 8.0 months (mo), p = 0.11; OS 20.3 vs 25.7 mo, p = 0.01.
Conclusions
In our real-world data set, we found a relevant efficacy difference between SUN-treated first-line mRCC pts who used AA therapy at baseline compared with AA non-users, especially in terms of OS. This should be taken into account when prescribing SUN in this setting.
Clinical trial identification
NCT00700258.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Funding
Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Disclosure
K. Schlack: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, Ipsen, Amgen, Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer, Ipsen, Astellas, Takeda, Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen-Cilag. M. Boegemann: Honoraria (self): Pfizer, Eisai, MSD, BMS, Ipsen, Eusa Pharma, Novartis. M. Woike: Full / Part-time employment: Pfizer Pharma GmbH. G. Krekeler: Full / Part-time employment: Pfizer Pharma GmbH. T. Fischer: Full / Part-time employment: Winicker-Norimed GmbH. L. Bergmann: Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS, Eusa, Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. M. Rink: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. A. Strauss: Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer, MBS, Eisai, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; Honoraria (self): Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen, Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract