Abstract 3618
Background
Advances in therapy, surgery and loco-regional procedures improved survival of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Interruptions, defined Drug Holidays (DH), could reduce toxicity in pts with stable disease. We evaluated the association between DH and overall survival (OS).
Methods
754 consecutive pts treated for mCRC, at University Hospital of Udine and IRCCS CRO of Aviano from 1/1/2005 to 15/03/2017, were included. DH was defined as 56 or more consecutive days of interruption, during first line. The association of DH to OS was evaluated through uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. OS was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results
Overall, 459 (60.9%) pts received continuous treatment while 255 (33.8%) a DH (5.3% missing data). After median follow-up of 68.6 months, median OS was 23.15 months. By univariate analysis, KRAS (HR 1.39; 95%CI 1.17-1.66; p < 0.001) and BRAF mutation (HR 1.39; 95%CI 1.02-1.90; p = 0.035), nodes (HR 1.92; 95%CI 1.49-2.46; p < 0.001) peritoneum (HR 1.72; 95%CI 1.38-2.15; p < 0.001), bone (HR 1.93; 95%CI 1.93; 1.02-3.64; pp = 0.043) and brain (HR 13.51; 95%CI 5.94-30.74; p < 0.001) involvement, ECOG PS (1 vs 0: HR 1.84; 95%CI 1.35-2.50,p<0.001; 2 vs 0: HR 2.87; 95%CI 1.89-4.33, p < 0.001), >1 metastatic sites (HR 1.61;95%CI 1.36-1.91; p < 0.001), DH (HR 0.43; 95%CI 0.36-0.52; p < 0.001), metastasectomy (HR 0.32; 95%CI 0.24-0.44; p < 0.001), left sidedness (HR 0.70; 95%ICI 0.58-0.86; p < 0.001), rectal tumor (HR 0.71; 95%CI 0.58-0.88; p = 0.002) and thermo-ablations (HR 0.34; 95%CI 0.25-0.47; p < 0.001) were associated with OS. In multivariate, BRAF mutation (HR 1.82; 95%CI 1.15-2.87; p = 0.010); ECOG PS 1 (HR 2.08; 95%CI 1.29-3.35; p = 0.003) and 2 (HR 3.57; 95%IC 1.91-6.63; p < 0.001) had worst prognosis. Conversely, DH (HR 0.44; 95%CI 0.35-0.57; p < 0.001), metastasectomy (HR 0.33; 95%CI 0.20-0.55; p < 0.001), thermo-ablations (HR 0.44; 95%CI 0.28-0.70; p = 0.001) and left sidedness (HR 0.72; 95%CI 0.55-0.95; p = 0.018) had better OS. Intriguingly, median OS was 35.3 months for DH and 18 months for continuous therapy.
Conclusions
DH was independently associated with better prognosis. Probably, DH is a proxy of better prognosis that clinicians intercept. Therefore, in accurately selected pts, DH can be safely offered.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
F. Puglisi: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Hoffmann-La Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pierre-Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3911 - Defining a SUV decrease cut-off in PET/CT response monitoring after one cycle of preoperative breast cancer chemotherapy
Presenter: Marcin Kubeczko
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1849 - Effect of thioredoxin 1 quantity detection to complement the mammography in breast cancer diagnosis
Presenter: Younju Lee
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2221 - Identification of ultralow risk breast cancer patients (probable overdiagnosis)
Presenter: Salvador Gamez Casado
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5291 - Prevalence of Vitamin D3 deficiency among women with early breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in an oncology dayward.
Presenter: Warner Finstad
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4247 - Changes in ER pathway activity score during neoadjuvant letrozole to assess therapy response and predict disease free survival (DFS) in ER positive breast cancer patients
Presenter: Arran Turnbull
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
568 - Second primary malignancies in patients with breast cancer.
Presenter: Carlos Erasun Lecuona
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1428 - Phase II randomized trial of neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP) with either palbociclib + letrozole (Pal+L) or paclitaxel (Pac) for elderly patients with estrogen receptor & HER2 positive (ER+/HER2+) Breast Cancer (BC) (International Breast Cancer Study Group IBCSG 55-17, TOUCH)
Presenter: Laura Biganzoli
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1479 - Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy with or without immunotherapy with pembrolizumab (neoHIP): an open label randomized phase 2 trial
Presenter: Heather McArthur
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1481 - A randomized phase 2 study of peri-operative ipilimumab, nivolumab and cryoablation versus standard care in women with residual, early stage/resectable, triple negative breast cancer after standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Heather McArthur
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4334 - ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030: A phase 3 study of standard adjuvant chemotherapy with or without atezolizumab in early stage triple negative breast cancer.
Presenter: Michail Ignatiadis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract