Abstract 5074
Background
Severe toxicity as a result of Fluoropyrimidine treatments appears in up 30% of patients. The reduce activity of DPD is one of the main cause of severe adverse events. Up to 8% of the population have low levels of DPD, and up to 0.5% of the population completely lack the enzyme. We assessed the effect of prospective screening for the 4 most relevant variants (DPYD*2A [rs3918290, c.1905 + 1G>A, IVS14 + 1G>A], c.2846A>T [rs67376798, D949V], c.1679T>G [rs55886062, DPYD*13, I560S], c.1236G>A [rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3]) and rs34743033 TYMS, on patient safety and dose individualization in daily clinical practice.
Methods
We described our experience in a Tertiary University Hospital. We reviewed 208 patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were planned to receive fluoropyrimide treatment and we did prospective genotyping for DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A and rs34743033 TYMS. Heterozygous DPD variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G), and DPYD wild-type patients were treated according to the current standard of care.
Results
From April 2017 to March 2019, 208 patients were pre-tested. 8 patients (3´8%) were heterozygous DPD variant allele carriers and 200 (96´2%) were DPD wild-type patients. Overall, fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity was higher in DPD variant carriers (2 [25%] of 8 patients) than in wild-type patients (70 [35%] of 200 patients). 2 patients with c.1236G>A and rs34743033 TYMS heterozygous were necessary to disrupt treatment in spite of dose reduction because of severe diarrhea. However, the other 6 heterozygous have low grade toxicity with reduction preplanned.
Conclusions
Life-threatening toxicities could be presented in patients with DPD deficiency if they are treated with standar dose of fluoropyridimes. Last colorectal cancer ESMO guidelines do not recommend testing DPD deficient up front. It recommend in case of patients who experience severe toxicity, DPD levels should be tested before 5-FU is re-introduced. We suggest due to our control of potential toxicities that implementation of DPD genotype individualised dosing should be a new standard of care.
Legal entity responsible for the study: Mediano Rambla.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2860 - Prognostic value of metabolic response assessed by 18FDG-PET after induction chemotherapy and after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients (pts) receiving definite CRT (dCRT)
Presenter: Yeonghak Bang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3881 - Comprehensive genomic profiling of early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Jing Zuo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3944 - A novel nomogram and risk classification system predicting radiation pneumonitis in patients with esophageal cancer receiving radiotherapy
Presenter: Lu Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1956 - Drinking alcohol, smoking, multiple dysplastic lesions and the risk of field cancerization of squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus and head and neck region
Presenter: Chikatoshi Katada
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2144 - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can eliminate the negative impact of postoperative infectious complications on recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer
Presenter: Kazuki Kano
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2403 - Comparison of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus definitive CRT with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in esophageal cancer
Presenter: Marcelle Cesca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3247 - Paclitaxel in Combination with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil(TPF) Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Borderline-resectable Esophageal Squamous cell Carcinoma: A Phase II Clinical Trial
Presenter: Yuhong Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4293 - Prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on local immunity evaluation
Presenter: Elena Zlatnik
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5419 - Impact of Sarcopenia and adiposity in survival of metastatic esophageal cancer (MEC)
Presenter: Aline Fares
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2083 - PALAESTRA - A phase II trial with short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy as palliative treatment in esophageal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: David Borg
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract