Abstract 5242
Background
Until now, we have managed all CRC patients (pts) in the same way, However, emergent data show that location of primary tumour can have a prognostic and predictive value in metastatic setting. In this study, we analized differences in sv for every stage between right (R) and left-sided (L) CRC.
Methods
This prospective, multicentre observational study was conducted in coordination with 22 public-sector hospitals of Spain. Pts diagnosed with new CRC, stage I-IV and surgically treated, were included. We defined R-CRC as tumours originated in cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure or transverse colon, and L in splenic flexure, descending and sigmoid colon or rectum.
Results
Data from 1742 pts were examined for sidedness, stage, and survival at 2 years. 509 (29.2%) had R and 1233 (70.8%) L-CRCs. Most of cases were non-metastatic (92.3%), and males (63.4%). At 2 years, 14.2% of R-CRCs and 15.8% of L-CRCs experienced a recurrence (p 0.408). Nevertheless, the survival analysis revealed a poorer outcome for R-CRCs, with less patients alive at 2 years: 86.6% (CI 95%:83.5 - 89.6) than L-CRCs: 92.4% (CI 95% 90.8 - 93.8); p < 0.001. The prognosis was significantly better for L-tumours in more advanced stages (III and IV), and in stage I as well. Patients with stage II seemed to have a very similar outcome, regardless their tumours were placed in right or left side. Only survival mean was slightly higher in R-CRCs, but percentage of survival at 2 years was the same for two both sides, without showing any statistical difference.Table:
594P Differences in survival between R-CRC and L-CRC in every stage
Stage | n(%) | Sv 2 years, % | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
R-CRC | L-CRC | |||
I | 374 (21.5) | 92.2 | 97.6 | 0.049 |
II | 641 (36.8) | 93.8 | 93.7 | 1.0 |
III | 594 (34.1) | 83.4 | 91.2 | 0.009 |
IV | 133 (7.6) | 48.6 | 75.5 | 0.006 |
Conclusions
Overall, prognosis is better for L-tumours in every stage, most notably in advances stages (III-IV). However, stage II behaves in a distinct manner and no differences in survival are found between R-CRC and L-CRCs in these pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
REDISSEC.
Funding
REDISSEC (RD12/0001/0010), Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (13/0013) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2670 - Molecular subtypes of metastatic(met) gastric cancer(GC) (MoTriGastric): new biomarkers closer to the clinics
Presenter: Maria Alsina Maqueda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3797 - Exploring candidate signal transduction pathways for targeted therapy in esophageal cancer
Presenter: Aafke Creemers
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5485 - Clinical implication of CLDN18, RhoGAP, and E-cadherin in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma
Presenter: Hyunho Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1970 - Identification of a spectrum of germline mutations for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer in the Russian population by next-generation sequencing.
Presenter: IRINA EFIMOVA
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4989 - The molecular profiling and prognostic value of Chinese gastric signet ring cell carcinoma patients
Presenter: Jia Wei
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
7145 - A phase 2 basket study of MCLA-128, a bispecific antibody targeting the HER3 pathway, in NRG1 fusion-positive advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Alison Schram
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1406 - Simultaneous Resection of Pancreatic Cancer and Liver Oligometastases After Induction Chemotherapy in Stage IV Patients:an Open-Label Prospective Randomized Multicenter phase 3 trial(CSPAC-1)
Presenter: Miaoyan Wei
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1530 - Multicenter randomized phase II trial of 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) with or without liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) as second-line therapy after progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis): NIFTY trial
Presenter: Changhoon Yoo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1563 - A randomized phase II study of Maintenance therapy with multiepitope vaccine Tedopi (OSE2101) ± nivolumab or FOLFIRI after induction chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFIRINOX in patients (Pts) with advanced Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) (TEDOPaM – PRODIGE 63 GERCOR study)
Presenter: Cindy Neuzillet
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2780 - A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study of durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers: TOPAZ-1
Presenter: Do-Youn Oh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract