Abstract 3275
Background
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are promising biomarkers in ovarian cancer. Their kinetics during treatment might be useful for monitoring disease burden, and guiding treatments in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery (IDS).
Methods
Serial blood samples of patients enrolled in the randomized phase II CHIVA trial, comparing neo-adjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel +/- nintedanib (NCT01583322), were investigated to assess the kinetics of 11 relevant miRNAs compared to CA125 kinetics, using C-index & survival tests for predictive and prognostic values. MiRNAs were extracted and quantified by qRT-PCR. The selection of the final 11 miRNAs was based on the expression levels found with a large explorative panel of 84 miRNAs in 8 patients, and on the literature: miR-15b-5p, miR-16-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-93-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-200b-3p, miR-148b-5p and miR-34a-5p.
Results
756 serial blood samples done every 3 weeks from 119 patients were analyzed for a total of 8172 miRNA assays, and 1299 CA-125 values. About 82% of miRNA concentrations were above the limits of quantification. The time courses of the miRNAs expressions were highly heterogeneous, and were not parallel with the CA-125 time changes. The miRNAs kinetics during treatment were not found associated with disease bulk changes, RECIST tumor response, or cytoreductive surgery outcomes (optimal vs non-optimal IDS). However, for 6 of them (miR-15b-5p; miR-16-5p; miR-20a-5p; miR-21-5p; miR-93-5p; and miR-195-5p), significant increases at disease progressions were found (median 40%). Decreases of miR-34a-5p and miR-93-5p were associated with PFS benefit (13.7 vs 24.8 months; p = 0.009) and OS benefits (34.3 months vs Not reached; p < 0.001), respectively, using univariate tests.
Conclusions
The longitudinal kinetics of miRNA expressions during neo-adjuvant treatment in ovarian cancer patients were inconsistent, and were not found to be associated with tumor burden changes. Although some prognostic value could be discussed, no predictive value regarding tumor responses or IDS quality could be identified.
Clinical trial identification
EudraCT: 2011-006288-23.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
ARCAGY-GINECO.
Funding
Boehringer Ingelheim.
Disclosure
I.L. Ray-Coquard: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Clovis; Honoraria (self): Tesaro; Honoraria (self): Pharma Mar; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Clovis; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: pharma Mar; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca. J. Florence: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS. A. Lortholary: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Tesaro. N. Raban: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. G. Ferron: Honoraria (self): Olympus Europe; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. J. Alexandre: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): PharmaMar; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis. A. Leary: Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Clovis; Advisory / Consultancy: Gamamab; Advisory / Consultancy: Gridstone; Advisory / Consultancy: Seattle Genetics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Clovis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Tesaro; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3630 - Results of phase 1 clinical trial of high doses of Seleno-L-methionine (SLM) in sequential combination with Axitinib in previously treated and relapsed clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) patients
Presenter: Yousef Zakharia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2356 - Safety and Efficacy of CDX-014 , an Antibody-Drug Conjugate against T Cell immunoglobulin mucin-1 (TIM-1), in advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1028 - SPAZO2 (SOGUG): Outcomes and prognostic significance of IMDC intermediate prognosis subclassification in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in patients treated with 1st-line pazopanib (1stPz).
Presenter: Begona P. Valderrama
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2293 - Effect of Antacid Intake on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Sunitinib (SUN) in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients (pts): a Sub-Analysis of the STAR-TOR Registry
Presenter: Katrin Schlack
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1451 - Randomized phase 3 trial of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: JAVELIN Renal 101 Japanese subgroup analysis
Presenter: Motohide Uemura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4399 - Overall and progression-free survival according to MSKCC scores in 1st line sunitinib treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Jindrich Finek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1344 - Combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3462 - A phase II trial of TKI induction followed by a randomized comparison between nivolumab or TKI continuation in renal cell carcinoma (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5268 - Nivolumab (N) treatment beyond progression in a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Sophie Hans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4235 - First results of safety profile of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in II and III line of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in NIVES Study
Presenter: Cristina Masini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract