Abstract 2601
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) acting against CTLA-4 and PD-1 represent a strenght therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM). Antineoplastic activity of ICIs through the activation of immune cells in tumor lesions raised challenge in evaluation of treatment response by imaging. Aim of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of different 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters (Metabolic Tumor Volume, MTV; Total Lesion Glycolisis, TLG; Maximum Standardised Uptake Value, SUVmax) to predict therapy response and clinical outcome in pts with MM treated with Ipilimumab (Ipi) and Nivolumab (Nivo) or Pembrolizumab (Pem) and to check for accuracy differences specific for the class of treatment.
Methods
57 MM pts receiving Ipi (25) or PD-1 inhibitors (Nivo 19; Pem 13) who performed a 18F-FDG PET/CT scan at the beginning (PET0) and after completion of Ipi or during anti PD-1 (PET1), were retrospectively evaluated. Response at PET1 was classified as PD, SD, PR and CR according to RECIST 1.1, EORTC criteria and by percentage change of MTV and TLG (cut off values: +43% for PD and -43% for PR, calculated by ROC analysis) of up to 5 target lesions. PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy (PERCIMT) were assessed alone and with the previously described parameters. Performance of each criteria at PET1 to predict pts having clinical benefit (CR, PR and SD) and no clinical benefit (PD) at 6 months since starting ICIs were assessed and correlated to time-to-progression.
Results
For Ipi pts group, best predictors of response were: variation of MTV (Sensitivity 1; Specificity 0.84; accuracy 0.96) and TLG (Se 0.89; Sp; 93.8; acc 0.92), with PERCIMT criteria for progressive disease. In anti-PD1 group overlapping predictivity values were found for EORTC, MTV and TLG (Se 0.95; Sp 1; Acc 0.97). Reliability of above parameters was also confirmed in predicting pts progression free survival at 12 and 24 months.
Conclusions
18F-FDG PET/CT performed 3 months later the first administration could predict response to ICIs and long-term patient clinical outcome. Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and criteria in predicting response to ICIs is influenced by the class of treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Local Ethic committee.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract