Abstract 2601
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) acting against CTLA-4 and PD-1 represent a strenght therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM). Antineoplastic activity of ICIs through the activation of immune cells in tumor lesions raised challenge in evaluation of treatment response by imaging. Aim of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of different 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters (Metabolic Tumor Volume, MTV; Total Lesion Glycolisis, TLG; Maximum Standardised Uptake Value, SUVmax) to predict therapy response and clinical outcome in pts with MM treated with Ipilimumab (Ipi) and Nivolumab (Nivo) or Pembrolizumab (Pem) and to check for accuracy differences specific for the class of treatment.
Methods
57 MM pts receiving Ipi (25) or PD-1 inhibitors (Nivo 19; Pem 13) who performed a 18F-FDG PET/CT scan at the beginning (PET0) and after completion of Ipi or during anti PD-1 (PET1), were retrospectively evaluated. Response at PET1 was classified as PD, SD, PR and CR according to RECIST 1.1, EORTC criteria and by percentage change of MTV and TLG (cut off values: +43% for PD and -43% for PR, calculated by ROC analysis) of up to 5 target lesions. PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy (PERCIMT) were assessed alone and with the previously described parameters. Performance of each criteria at PET1 to predict pts having clinical benefit (CR, PR and SD) and no clinical benefit (PD) at 6 months since starting ICIs were assessed and correlated to time-to-progression.
Results
For Ipi pts group, best predictors of response were: variation of MTV (Sensitivity 1; Specificity 0.84; accuracy 0.96) and TLG (Se 0.89; Sp; 93.8; acc 0.92), with PERCIMT criteria for progressive disease. In anti-PD1 group overlapping predictivity values were found for EORTC, MTV and TLG (Se 0.95; Sp 1; Acc 0.97). Reliability of above parameters was also confirmed in predicting pts progression free survival at 12 and 24 months.
Conclusions
18F-FDG PET/CT performed 3 months later the first administration could predict response to ICIs and long-term patient clinical outcome. Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and criteria in predicting response to ICIs is influenced by the class of treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Local Ethic committee.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract