Abstract 2760
Background
TMB is an emerging biomarker for immune-therapy including metastasized UBC. The evaluation of reliable methods to determine the TMB value is a prerequisite for successful application of IO therapies.
Methods
TMB was assessed in genomic DNA from 39 muscle-invasive UBC by whole genome sequencing (GPS Cancer©, NantHealth). In 45 cases sequencing with the TruSight Oncology 500, (TSO500, Illumina) was performed. Immune cell (IC) infiltrates were analyzed by CD3, CD8, CD56, PD-1 and CD68 immunohistochemistry. PD-L1 status was evaluated by the SP263 assay (Ventana). Intrinsic subtypes (MDACC-approach) were assessed via a Nanostring-assay. Immune phenotypes were assessed by (I) spatial distribution of IC and (II) a T-cell inflammation related gene expression signature consisting of 29 genes (Nanostring). Results were validated in the TCGA MIBC cohort.
Results
Correlation between TSO500 and WGS revealed high concordance (spearman-correlation: r = 0.68, p < 0.0001). Overall percentage agreement was 76.9% for a cut-off of 10 mut/mb and 84.6% for 15 mut/mb. We found no significant association of high TMB at different cut-offs (10 mut/mb, 15 mut/mb) with inflammation status and different immune cell populations in both cohorts. TMB was not associated with intrinsic subtypes. Spatially distributed IC phenotypes or PD-L1 status was not associated with TMB. Hierarchical clustering of all factors revealed four distinct subgroups: Cluster A Inflamed, PD-L1 “high”, TMB high (n = 5); Cluster B Inflamed, PD-L1 “high”, TMB low-intermediate (n = 14); Cluster C: Uninflamed, PD-L1 “low”, TMB intermediate-high (n = 14); Cluster D Uninflamed, PD-L1 “low”, TMB low (n = 12).
Conclusions
This study provides insights into the reliability of a NGS panel for the prediction of TMB in MIBC which shows comparable performance to WGS. High TMB seems to be a characteristic of MIBC which occurs regardless of PD-L1 and inflammation status. TMB could possibly identify additional patients who do not fulfill the PD-L1 assessment based criteria for checkpoint inhibition.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Illumina, California, United States of America NantHealth, Culver City, California, United States of America.
Disclosure
M. Eckstein: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen-Cilag. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3140 - Phase 2 study of olaparib in previously treated advanced solid tumors with homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) or homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD): LYNK-002
Presenter: David Hyman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2655 - The K-BASKET trial: A prospective phase II biomarker-driven multiple basket trial in Korean solid cancer patients.
Presenter: Seul Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5938 - Cambridge Liquid biopsy “CALIBRATION” study: Can changes in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) predict durable tumour responses in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer receiving MEDI4736?
Presenter: Constanza Linossi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3799 - Validation of a tumour mutational burden workflow on routine histological samples of colorectal cancer and assessment of a cohort with synchronous hepatic metastases
Presenter: Andrea Mafficini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4647 - Microsatellite Instability Testing and Lynch Syndrome Screening For Colorectal Cancer Patients Through Tumor Sequencing
Presenter: Li Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3231 - "Liquid Withdarw" technique in CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy: decreased incidence of complications and increased tissue amount for lung cancer molecular testing.
Presenter: Xue Wang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3282 - WGS Implementation in standard cancer Diagnostics for Every cancer patient (WIDE)
Presenter: Paul Roepman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5905 - Known and unknown gene fusion detection capabilities of solid tumor laboratories conducting next generation sequencing in 6 countries
Presenter: Steph Finucane
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4238 - Clinical and Analytical Accuracy of a 523 Gene Panel Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Assay on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Solid Tumor Samples
Presenter: Ina Deras
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2493 - Methylation analysis of MLH1 using droplet digital PCR and methylation sensitive restriction enzyme.
Presenter: Celine De Rop
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract