Abstract 2323
Background
It is well documented that survival of CRC is dependent on early diagnosis. In England, the Department of Health’s cancer policy states that patients with symptoms of suspected cancer must be seen and assessed by the specialist team within 2 weeks of a referral by their General Practitioner (GP). The traditional 2 week wait (2ww) referral route involves these patients being seen in clinic within 2 weeks, where they are assessed and an investigation is booked, taking up to 4 weeks for first investigation and diagnosis. We have introduced a novel Straight to Test / CTAP for these patients, which rationalises the patient journey, ensuring that the patient has the right test first time, without delay.
Methods
Our service is a Consultant Nurse led Straight to Test / CTAP. All 2ww patients referred by the GP with suspected CRC are assessed via the CTAP. Upon receipt of the electronic referral from their GP, a colorectal assessment is carried out via telephone within 48 hours of referral by the Consultant nurse or a member or her specialist nursing team. The patient is then triaged for the most appropriate investigation, according to a protocol, which is then booked within 2 weeks of the GPs referral.
Results
The CTAP has been running now for 5 years with over 4000 patients being assessed via this route. In 2017 & 2018 the cancer yield from our service was 4% which matches that of traditional out-patient assessments routes. However we were able to reduce the patient pathway by 10 days by the introduction of the CTAP. 70% of patients had an endoscopy procedure as their first investigation and 28% had a radiological investigation (usually CT Colonography). 90% of patients had their diagnosis or given the all clear by day 14.
Conclusions
This pathway has significantly shortened the patient’s pathway and time diagnosis for our patients, meaning that those patients with CRC are diagnosed by day 14. Patients with other pathologies are also diagnosed quicker and those patients with no serious pathology are reassured and discharged back to their GP We have managed to reduce waiting times from referral to diagnosis and to ensure all patients on the 2ww pathway have a more streamline patient focused experience, avoiding unnecessary hospital visits.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract