Abstract 2323
Background
It is well documented that survival of CRC is dependent on early diagnosis. In England, the Department of Health’s cancer policy states that patients with symptoms of suspected cancer must be seen and assessed by the specialist team within 2 weeks of a referral by their General Practitioner (GP). The traditional 2 week wait (2ww) referral route involves these patients being seen in clinic within 2 weeks, where they are assessed and an investigation is booked, taking up to 4 weeks for first investigation and diagnosis. We have introduced a novel Straight to Test / CTAP for these patients, which rationalises the patient journey, ensuring that the patient has the right test first time, without delay.
Methods
Our service is a Consultant Nurse led Straight to Test / CTAP. All 2ww patients referred by the GP with suspected CRC are assessed via the CTAP. Upon receipt of the electronic referral from their GP, a colorectal assessment is carried out via telephone within 48 hours of referral by the Consultant nurse or a member or her specialist nursing team. The patient is then triaged for the most appropriate investigation, according to a protocol, which is then booked within 2 weeks of the GPs referral.
Results
The CTAP has been running now for 5 years with over 4000 patients being assessed via this route. In 2017 & 2018 the cancer yield from our service was 4% which matches that of traditional out-patient assessments routes. However we were able to reduce the patient pathway by 10 days by the introduction of the CTAP. 70% of patients had an endoscopy procedure as their first investigation and 28% had a radiological investigation (usually CT Colonography). 90% of patients had their diagnosis or given the all clear by day 14.
Conclusions
This pathway has significantly shortened the patient’s pathway and time diagnosis for our patients, meaning that those patients with CRC are diagnosed by day 14. Patients with other pathologies are also diagnosed quicker and those patients with no serious pathology are reassured and discharged back to their GP We have managed to reduce waiting times from referral to diagnosis and to ensure all patients on the 2ww pathway have a more streamline patient focused experience, avoiding unnecessary hospital visits.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract