Abstract 2323
Background
It is well documented that survival of CRC is dependent on early diagnosis. In England, the Department of Health’s cancer policy states that patients with symptoms of suspected cancer must be seen and assessed by the specialist team within 2 weeks of a referral by their General Practitioner (GP). The traditional 2 week wait (2ww) referral route involves these patients being seen in clinic within 2 weeks, where they are assessed and an investigation is booked, taking up to 4 weeks for first investigation and diagnosis. We have introduced a novel Straight to Test / CTAP for these patients, which rationalises the patient journey, ensuring that the patient has the right test first time, without delay.
Methods
Our service is a Consultant Nurse led Straight to Test / CTAP. All 2ww patients referred by the GP with suspected CRC are assessed via the CTAP. Upon receipt of the electronic referral from their GP, a colorectal assessment is carried out via telephone within 48 hours of referral by the Consultant nurse or a member or her specialist nursing team. The patient is then triaged for the most appropriate investigation, according to a protocol, which is then booked within 2 weeks of the GPs referral.
Results
The CTAP has been running now for 5 years with over 4000 patients being assessed via this route. In 2017 & 2018 the cancer yield from our service was 4% which matches that of traditional out-patient assessments routes. However we were able to reduce the patient pathway by 10 days by the introduction of the CTAP. 70% of patients had an endoscopy procedure as their first investigation and 28% had a radiological investigation (usually CT Colonography). 90% of patients had their diagnosis or given the all clear by day 14.
Conclusions
This pathway has significantly shortened the patient’s pathway and time diagnosis for our patients, meaning that those patients with CRC are diagnosed by day 14. Patients with other pathologies are also diagnosed quicker and those patients with no serious pathology are reassured and discharged back to their GP We have managed to reduce waiting times from referral to diagnosis and to ensure all patients on the 2ww pathway have a more streamline patient focused experience, avoiding unnecessary hospital visits.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5544 - Evaluation of a radiomic signature of CD8 cells in patients treated with immunotherapy-radiotherapy in three clinical trials.
Presenter: Roger Sun
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract