Abstract 3505
Background
Seth et al. (ASCO 19) identified four biologic classes based on longitudinal molecular profiling of TNBC tumors pre- and post- neoadjuvant adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (AC). The four groups were defined based on the enriched and depleted hallmark pathways that were observed. The low-overall change (LOC) group was defined as having no significant change in the pathways in pre- and post-AC biopsies. Of note, this group of patients had lower pathological complete response (pCR) rates. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical features of early-stage (I-III) TNBC patients with tumors exhibiting LOC in their biopsies with neoadjuvant therapy.
Methods
We analyzed the clinical characteristics of 48 patients with early stage (I-III) TNBC enrolled in the ARTEMIS trial (NCT02276443). All patients received neoadjuvant AC; 48% of patients were subsequently treated on a clinical trial and 52% received standard taxane-based chemotherapy. We compared the clinical characteristics of 17 patients in the LOC group with 31 patients in the other three biologic classes. Two-group comparison was performed using Chi-squared test.
Results
Age at diagnosis, histology, Vanderbilt subtype, Ki-67, sTIL levels and vimentin expression were similar between the groups. Median age at diagnosis in the LOC group was 58 (range, 27-74). All patients in this group were stage II-III, with no stage I identified. 59% of patients in the LOC group had stage III disease compared with 26% in the other groups (p = 0.02), Also, 47% of patients in this group had AR ≥ 10% compared to 19% in the other biological groups (p = 0.04).Table:
252P
Variable | Group | Low-Overall Change Group (n = 17) | % | Other Biologic Classes (n = 31) | % | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age at diagnosis | ≤60 | 10 | 59 | 25 | 81 | 0.10 |
>60 | 7 | 41 | 6 | 19 | ||
Stage | I | 0 | 0 | 6 | 19 | N/A |
II | 7 | 41 | 17 | 55 | 0.36 | |
III | 10 | 59 | 8 | 26 | 0.02 | |
Histology | Invasive ductal | 15 | 88 | 26 | 84 | 0.23 |
Metaplastic | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | ||
Apocrine | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
Other | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 | ||
Vanderbilt subtype | BL | 3 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 0.24 |
LAR | 4 | 24 | 2 | 6 | ||
M/MSL | 3 | 18 | 11 | 35 | ||
IM | 2 | 12 | 4 | 12 | ||
Ki-67 (%) | ≥ 50 | 8 | 47 | 21 | 68 | 0.16 |
< 50 | 9 | 53 | 10 | 32 | ||
Androgen Receptor Expression (%) | ≥ 10 | 8 | 47 | 6 | 19 | 0.04 |
< 10 | 9 | 53 | 25 | 81 | ||
Vimentin Expression (%) | ≥50 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 13 | 0.91 |
<50 | 15 | 88 | 27 | 87 | ||
sTIL | Low (<5) | 7 | 41 | 15 | 48 | 0.37 |
Moderate (≥5-30) | 9 | 52 | 11 | 35 | ||
High (>30) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Conclusions
Patients with low-overall change in their tumors had later-stage disease and higher AR expression. Previous analysis by Seth et al. has demonstrated a lower pCR rate in this group with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This analysis highlights the potential role of androgen deprivation in this class of tumors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Moonshots Program and a CPRIT Multi-Investigator Research Award (MIRA).
Disclosure
S. Moulder: Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): Genentech; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (self): EMD Serono; Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4331 - STING Agonist, ADU-S100, Yields Potent Antitumor Activity and Therapeutically Favorable Immune Profile in an Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Model
Presenter: Ali Zaidi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1770 - Increased assessment of HER2 in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study
Presenter: Willemieke Dijksterhuis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3755 - A new docetaxel (DOC)-based triplet regimen does not improve the outcome of metastatic (M) or locally advanced (LA) gastric cancer (GC) as compared with an epirubicin (EPI) standard triplet regimen: a GISCAD trial.
Presenter: Roberto Labianca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2439 - The analysis of T cell subsets and clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockades in patients with advanced gastric cancer using multiplex immunohistochemistry
Presenter: Tae-yong Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2211 - First-line pembrolizumab (P), trastuzumab (T), capecitabine (C) and oxaliplatin (O) in HER2-positive metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
Presenter: Yelena Janjigian
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3046 - Monitoring patient-specific mutation in ctDNA and CTC for tumor response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (NCT03425058)
Presenter: Tao Fu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4628 - Gastric cancer screening in BRCA 2 gene mutation carriers: should it be recommended?
Presenter: Inês Oliveira
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2127 - Interim analysis of an observational/translational study for nivolumab treatment in advanced gastric cancer: JACCRO GC-08 (DELIVER trial)
Presenter: Yu Sunakawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2264 - Prediction of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in Stage II/III gastric cancer treatment based on comprehensive gene expression analysis
Presenter: Masanori Terashima
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2444 - Assessing the clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA through longitudinal liquid biopsy sampling in Oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Emma Ococks
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract