Abstract 3569
Background
Phase I clinical trials (Ph1) are crucial in the development of new anticancer therapies. New generation Ph1 investigating novel classes of drugs led to consistent improvements in response rates and clinical benefit in enrolled patients (pts). The aim of our study is to evaluate pts enrolled in Ph1 testing targeted therapies (TT), immunotherapy (IT), and their combinations.
Methods
Data of pts screened for enrollment in Ph1 in our institution were retrieved from clinical records. Primary objectives of the study were to determine overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR), according to RECIST 1.1 or iRECIST criteria (if applicable). Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of different variables on ORR and CBR.
Results
From December 2014 to November 2018, 723 pts were screened [median age 57 years (22-82)]. Primary tumor locations included breast (27.7%), biliary tract (15.5%), pancreas (8.9%), lung (6.8%), colorectal (6.5%), and ovary (4.8%). 275/723 (38.0%) pts had >2 metastatic sites; 304/723 (42.0%) received >2 lines of treatment in the metastatic setting. 481 patients (66.5%) resulted screen failure, mainly due to the absence of druggable molecular alteration(s) for biomarker- driven Ph1 (56.1%), abnormal lab results (12.7%), or poor performance status (11.4%). Conversely, the 242 (33.5%) eligible pts received IT (47.5%), TT (48.3%), or IT+TT combinations (4.2%). At time of data analysis, 209 (88.6%) patients experienced disease progression. ORR and CBR were 14.8% and 28.0%, respectively. No differences were found per age (>70y), sex or drug class. Pts with ≤2 metastatic sites had a higher CBR (OR 2.67, 95%, CI 1.39-5.10; Wald test p=.003), while pts who received ≤2 lines of treatment in the metastatic setting presented with higher ORR (OR 2.37; 95%, CI 1.03-5.44; Wald test p=.004).
Conclusions
Our results confirmed the consistent improvement in terms of CBR and ORR of the new generation Ph1 as compared to historical reported data. Better outcomes were observed in less pre-treated pts with lower burden of disease, suggesting that Ph1 should be proposed in earlier lines of therapy to derive a greater benefit. Further analyses on a larger cohort of Ph1 patients are currently ongoing.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1613 - Lerociclib (G1T38), an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, dosed continuously in combination with osimertinib for EGFRmut non-small cell lung cancer: initial Phase 1b results
Presenter: David Berz
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2853 - Real-world implementation of sequential targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated NSCLC
Presenter: Petros Christopoulos
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1974 - A Phase II Open-Label, Multicentre Study to Assess the Anti-tumour Activity of Afatinib in Patients with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor mutation (EGFRm) from Circulating Tumor DNA (CtDNA)
Presenter: Young-Chul Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3370 - Influence of cow’s milk on the absorption and exposure of erlotinib in NSCLC patients
Presenter: Geerten Veerman
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5900 - PTEN loss as Predictor of Tumor Heterogeneity (TH) and Poor Prognosis in EGFR-mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ANSCLC) Patients (pts) Receiving Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs).
Presenter: Miriam Ferrara
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1302 - Safety of lorlatinib in subgroups of patients from a phase 1/2 trial
Presenter: Enriqueta Felip
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1497 - Brigatinib (BRG) in Asian vs non-Asian patients (pts) with crizotinib (CRZ)-refractory ALK+ NSCLC in the phase 2 ALTA trial
Presenter: Dae Ho Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2349 - The safety assessment of crizotinib and alectinib from real world data of 840 ALK-inhibitor naïve patients with NSCLC harboring ALK-rearrangement (WJOG9516L).
Presenter: Kei Kunimasa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1120 - Brigatinib in ALK TKI-pretreated ALK+ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC): the Use Via Expanded Access to Brigatinib (UVEA-Brig) study
Presenter: Silvia Novello
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5239 - Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients (pts) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in US clinical practice
Presenter: Matthew Krebs
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract