Abstract 2494
Background
CAR-T cells are a new cancer treatment, where T cells are taken from the patient and modified in a laboratory to target cancer cells. There have been some promising results from early clinical trials, which have led to two products being made available to patients in the NHS. Axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma patients and tisagenlecleucel for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma patients and relapsed/refractory B-ALL patients under the age of 25. There are multiple clinical trials in progress throughout Europe, mostly in the haematology setting, with some in oncology. There are significant toxicities to this treatment modality and this is a complex heavily pre-treated patient population. Education of the wider nursing and multi professional team is therefore crucial. A new Lecturer Practitioner role was established, to focus on CAR-T. This poster explores nurses’ learning needs associated with introducing CAR-T therapy in a specialist cancer hospital in London, UK.
Methods
Data has been collected through evaluation of previous nursing educational initiatives in CAR-T therapy, which aimed to identify further learning needs. Further data collection is in development.
Results
Although this work is on-going, initial findings indicate that nurses require more education and support particularly around managing toxicities and patient expectations. Challenges for educating nurses also include uncertainties around the long-term effects of this treatment modality.
Conclusions
CAR-T therapy is being implemented at multiple centres throughout the UK/Europe and it is evident that there are a multitude of future opportunities for career development for nurses in this area. The role of a Lecturer Practitioner in CAR-T at a specialist cancer hospital has been created to address some of the educational needs of the nursing and multi-professional team. The post holder is involved in a wide range of educational initiatives, from national bespoke study days and academic cancer care modules to ward based teaching. It is clear that there is a need for a role that combines clinical practice and academia, bridging the theory to practice gap and providing expert clinical knowledge to nurses caring for these patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Ellard: Honoraria (self): MolMed; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Kite Gilead. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract