Abstract 4123
Background
“The South Thailand Insurgency” is burning violence in the deep south of Thailand. The insurgency which has been ongoing since 2004 has played out in the three southern most districts of the country Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat and some area of Songkhla, so-called the “Red Zone”. Violence such as daily ambush, bombing on soldiers and civilians, caused people living in terror. This violence has affected cancer service. Many cancer patients gave up on their lives due to struggle with the disease itself, security concerns, traveling and caregiving burden led to a high loss to follow-up rate. We, an oncology service team working at Songklanagarind hospital, the only one radiation and oncology center located in this area, in cooperation with doctors and nurses working in the Red Zone created a network and utilized an electronic consultation and referral system to alleviate these suffering. We preliminarily reported its real-life performance in 3 years period.
Methods
Electronic consultation system(E-consult) was a web-based program designed and developed to provide advice and facilitate the referral process in cancer care. Since October 2015, we prospectively surveyed the impact of this pilot project on the quality of service by counting waiting time, the number of center visit until treatment, unnecessary referral avoidance, patient and potential cost saving compared to the normal referral system.
Results
E-consult reached out to 7 hospitals and 589 patient referred through E-consult. Among patients from the Red Zone, without E-consult, their average waiting time was 56.4 days, the number of visits was 6.5 visits. The estimated financial burden was $758.8 per patient. After the implementation of E-consult in 259 patients, the average time to treatment was 41.5 days (p = 0.006) and the number of counter visit was 2.3 visits (p < 0.001). The estimated financial burden was $358.7(p < 0.001). We prevented 28 patients from the unnecessary referral.
Conclusions
In this special context, the electronic referral system not only was helpful to improve medical access, timeliness to specialist care, saving the patients’ family time and resources but it also supports the doctors and nurses on duty in the Red Zone.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Nanthiya Rattanakhot.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5544 - Evaluation of a radiomic signature of CD8 cells in patients treated with immunotherapy-radiotherapy in three clinical trials.
Presenter: Roger Sun
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract