Abstract 3524
Background
Cabazitaxel (CAB) was marketed in 2012 in Italy, based on overall survival (OS) benefit demonstrated on the TROPIC study in mCRPC post-docetaxel. The efficacy and tolerability of CAB is overlapping in all age groups, though for very elderly patients (pts) it has never really been verified.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective, observational real-life study in 57 octogenarian pts, treated with CAB in eleven Italian cancer centers from 2012 to 2018. Feasibility of treatment has been investigated by duration of treatment and its tolerability. Duration of treatment and toxicity profile were also evaluated according to ≥ 85 years, ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2 and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) questionnaire.
Results
This retrospective cohort included 57 mCRPC pts (median age 83.5 years; 21% aged over 85 years), 24% with exclusive bone metastatic disease, 50% with high-volume bone disease, 15% with high volume bone disease and visceral disease. Thirty-nine (68%) received the CGA questionnaire assessment, 34 resulted fit and 5 vulnerable. Ten (14%) had an ECOG PS ≥ 2, 9% received CAB as second-line, 23 (40%) as third-line, 29 (51%) as forth or more line. CAB was administered at 25 mg/sqm in 30 (52%) pts, and 20 mg/sqm or adapted schedules in 27 (48%). These latter schedules were adopted mainly in the subgroups with age > 85 years (75%), PS ≥ 2 (87.5%) and vulnerable according CGA questionnaires (100%). The median duration of treatment with CAB in all pts was 4.8 months, range 1-19 months (mo); 4.5 mo in those aged > 85 years, 4.4 mo in the vulnerable pts and 3.5 mo in pts with PS ≥ 2. The most represented grade 3-4 toxicity in the whole cohort were neutropenia (14%) and diarrhea (10.5%). Six patients (10.5%) drop out the treatment for significant toxicities: 3 febrile neutropenia G4, 2 diarrhea G4 and 1 severe cardiotoxicity, 5 (83%) of these pts received the 25 mg/sqm schedule, and 4 pts (67%) aged between 80-84 yeras with ECOG PS = 0 did not performed the CGA assessment before treatment. One death due to intestinal perforation non-clearly treatment-related was reported.
Conclusions
Octogenarian patients may be treated with CAB with the 20 mg/sqm regimen associated with less treatment interruptions. The CGA could contribute to better select pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract