Abstract 2512
Background
Activation of AXL receptor tyrosine kinase is a key mediator of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). AXL is overexpressed in several human cancers, including CRC.
Methods
AXL expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor samples from 346 mCRC pts treated at three Institutions and enrolled in different clinical trials (CAPRI, MACBETH, MOMA, TRIBE2). In silico data of AXL RNA levels were obtained from GSE5851 dataset, including 80 pts with advanced mCRC treated with cetuximab in a later line.
Results
AXL expression was found in 18% of cases within tumor cells, with no difference among RAS cohorts. In the RAS WT group, AXL positive pts had a worse mPFS whether treated with chemotherapy (CT) + anti-EGFR [6.2 m (CI95% 4.2- 8.2) vs 12.1 m (CI95% 10.6 – 13.6) p 0.012] or CT+anti-angiogenic agent [6.7 m (CI95% 8.9- 19.3) vs 14.1 m (CI95% 9.4– 13.0) p 0.007], whereas in RAS mutant pts no impact on PFS was observed. AXL expression correlated with worse mOS in both cohorts; notably, in RAS WT pts mOS was 19.9 m (CI95% 10.5- 29.2) vs 37.6 m (CI95% 31.1– 44.1) p 0.006]. In tumor stroma, assessable in 334 samples, AXL was expressed in 80% of cases, with no difference among RAS groups. AXL expression correlated with lower mOS in both cohorts. (Table) Intriguingly, AXL expression in tumor and stroma (+/+) correlated with shorter mOS; in particular, RAS WT pts (+/+) had a mOS of 19.9 m (CI95% 8.0- 31.7) vs (-/-) 50.1 m (CI95% 43.9- 56.2) p 0.004]. In silico analyses showed high AXL RNA levels in 50% of pts. Moreover, in this population treated with cetuximab, in the KRAS exon2 WT cohort (N = 43) AXL high pts had worse mPFS [1.9 m (CI95% 1.7 -2.0) vs 3.8 m (CI95% 0.7-6.7) p 0.59].Table: 121P
Cohort | AXL expression in tumor cells | AXL expression in stroma | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | |
Overall population | 346 | 285 (82) | 61 (18) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.008 | 32.4 vs 23.0 0.007 | 334 | 66 (20) | 268 (80) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.11 | 41.1 vs 28.5 0.004 |
RAS WT (overall) | 175 | 147 (84) | 28 (16) | 12.3 vs 6.6 <0.000 | 37.6 vs 19.9 0.006 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 15.0 vs 10.7 0.034 | 49.8 vs 33.5 0.031 |
RAS WT CT + anti-EGFR | 136 | 114 (84) | 22 (16) | 12.1 vs 6.2 0.012 | 35.8 vs 23.0 0.087 | 129 | 18 (14) | 111 (86) | 14.3 vs 10.4 0.37 | 44.4 vs 33.5 0.11 |
RAS WT CT + anti-angiogenic | 39 | 33 (85) | 6 (15) | 14.1 vs 6.7 0.007 | 44.8 vs 13.2 0.004 | 38 | 15 (39) | 23 (61) | 15.0 vs 11.0 0.12 | 50.1 vs 40.6 0.17 |
RAS mut (overall) CT + anti-angiogenic | 171 | 138 (81) | 33 (19) | 9.6 vs 8.9 0.78 | 27.6 vs 23.7 0.33 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 9.7 vs 9.2 0.98 | 35.5 vs 24.7 0.056 |
Conclusions
AXL expression in tumor and stroma might have a negative prognostic relevance in mCRC. In RAS WT pts, AXL expression might represent a predictive biomarker of lack of efficacy for both anti-EGFR and anti-angiogenic agents.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli".
Funding
AIRC MFAG-2015-ID: 7778.
Disclosure
F. Ciardiello: Advisory / Consultancy, Advisory Board: Merck KgA, Bayer, Amgen, Roche, Servier, Pfizer. E. Martinelli: Advisory / Consultancy: Merck KgA, Amgen, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2743 - The Impact of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Melanoma Brain Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Presenter: Mario Mandala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5479 - Intracranial Anti-Tumor Activity in Melanoma Brain Metastases with Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis
Presenter: Jose Lutzky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3560 - Outcomes of Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastases (MBM) Treated with Standard of Care Therapy After Being Excluded from MBM-Specific Clinical Trials
Presenter: Kourtney Holbrook
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3175 - The analysis of current treatment outcomes in melanoma patients with brain metastases
Presenter: Joanna Placzke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4550 - A multivariate model to define prognostic groups among patients with melanoma brain metastases: a 10-year retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Giacomo Pelizzari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4191 - The immune landscape of melanoma significantly influences survival in patients with highly mutated tumors.
Presenter: Robert Ferguson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1625 - Final Results from Phase II of Combination with Canerpaturev (formerly HF10), an Oncolytic Viral Immunotherapy, and Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma in 2nd-or later line treatment
Presenter: Kenji Yokota
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5346 - Evaluating polygenic risk score prediction model for melanoma prognosis
Presenter: Miriam Potrony
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5477 - Impact of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Maria Grazia Vitale
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3469 - Ancillary evaluation of systemic immune antitumor response (SIAR) and tumor growth rate (TGR) of patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) treated with radiotherapy (RT) combined with ipilimumab (ipi) in the phase 1 study Mel-Ipi-Rx.
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract