Abstract 2512
Background
Activation of AXL receptor tyrosine kinase is a key mediator of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). AXL is overexpressed in several human cancers, including CRC.
Methods
AXL expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor samples from 346 mCRC pts treated at three Institutions and enrolled in different clinical trials (CAPRI, MACBETH, MOMA, TRIBE2). In silico data of AXL RNA levels were obtained from GSE5851 dataset, including 80 pts with advanced mCRC treated with cetuximab in a later line.
Results
AXL expression was found in 18% of cases within tumor cells, with no difference among RAS cohorts. In the RAS WT group, AXL positive pts had a worse mPFS whether treated with chemotherapy (CT) + anti-EGFR [6.2 m (CI95% 4.2- 8.2) vs 12.1 m (CI95% 10.6 – 13.6) p 0.012] or CT+anti-angiogenic agent [6.7 m (CI95% 8.9- 19.3) vs 14.1 m (CI95% 9.4– 13.0) p 0.007], whereas in RAS mutant pts no impact on PFS was observed. AXL expression correlated with worse mOS in both cohorts; notably, in RAS WT pts mOS was 19.9 m (CI95% 10.5- 29.2) vs 37.6 m (CI95% 31.1– 44.1) p 0.006]. In tumor stroma, assessable in 334 samples, AXL was expressed in 80% of cases, with no difference among RAS groups. AXL expression correlated with lower mOS in both cohorts. (Table) Intriguingly, AXL expression in tumor and stroma (+/+) correlated with shorter mOS; in particular, RAS WT pts (+/+) had a mOS of 19.9 m (CI95% 8.0- 31.7) vs (-/-) 50.1 m (CI95% 43.9- 56.2) p 0.004]. In silico analyses showed high AXL RNA levels in 50% of pts. Moreover, in this population treated with cetuximab, in the KRAS exon2 WT cohort (N = 43) AXL high pts had worse mPFS [1.9 m (CI95% 1.7 -2.0) vs 3.8 m (CI95% 0.7-6.7) p 0.59].Table: 121P
Cohort | AXL expression in tumor cells | AXL expression in stroma | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | |
Overall population | 346 | 285 (82) | 61 (18) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.008 | 32.4 vs 23.0 0.007 | 334 | 66 (20) | 268 (80) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.11 | 41.1 vs 28.5 0.004 |
RAS WT (overall) | 175 | 147 (84) | 28 (16) | 12.3 vs 6.6 <0.000 | 37.6 vs 19.9 0.006 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 15.0 vs 10.7 0.034 | 49.8 vs 33.5 0.031 |
RAS WT CT + anti-EGFR | 136 | 114 (84) | 22 (16) | 12.1 vs 6.2 0.012 | 35.8 vs 23.0 0.087 | 129 | 18 (14) | 111 (86) | 14.3 vs 10.4 0.37 | 44.4 vs 33.5 0.11 |
RAS WT CT + anti-angiogenic | 39 | 33 (85) | 6 (15) | 14.1 vs 6.7 0.007 | 44.8 vs 13.2 0.004 | 38 | 15 (39) | 23 (61) | 15.0 vs 11.0 0.12 | 50.1 vs 40.6 0.17 |
RAS mut (overall) CT + anti-angiogenic | 171 | 138 (81) | 33 (19) | 9.6 vs 8.9 0.78 | 27.6 vs 23.7 0.33 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 9.7 vs 9.2 0.98 | 35.5 vs 24.7 0.056 |
Conclusions
AXL expression in tumor and stroma might have a negative prognostic relevance in mCRC. In RAS WT pts, AXL expression might represent a predictive biomarker of lack of efficacy for both anti-EGFR and anti-angiogenic agents.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli".
Funding
AIRC MFAG-2015-ID: 7778.
Disclosure
F. Ciardiello: Advisory / Consultancy, Advisory Board: Merck KgA, Bayer, Amgen, Roche, Servier, Pfizer. E. Martinelli: Advisory / Consultancy: Merck KgA, Amgen, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract