Abstract 2512
Background
Activation of AXL receptor tyrosine kinase is a key mediator of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). AXL is overexpressed in several human cancers, including CRC.
Methods
AXL expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor samples from 346 mCRC pts treated at three Institutions and enrolled in different clinical trials (CAPRI, MACBETH, MOMA, TRIBE2). In silico data of AXL RNA levels were obtained from GSE5851 dataset, including 80 pts with advanced mCRC treated with cetuximab in a later line.
Results
AXL expression was found in 18% of cases within tumor cells, with no difference among RAS cohorts. In the RAS WT group, AXL positive pts had a worse mPFS whether treated with chemotherapy (CT) + anti-EGFR [6.2 m (CI95% 4.2- 8.2) vs 12.1 m (CI95% 10.6 – 13.6) p 0.012] or CT+anti-angiogenic agent [6.7 m (CI95% 8.9- 19.3) vs 14.1 m (CI95% 9.4– 13.0) p 0.007], whereas in RAS mutant pts no impact on PFS was observed. AXL expression correlated with worse mOS in both cohorts; notably, in RAS WT pts mOS was 19.9 m (CI95% 10.5- 29.2) vs 37.6 m (CI95% 31.1– 44.1) p 0.006]. In tumor stroma, assessable in 334 samples, AXL was expressed in 80% of cases, with no difference among RAS groups. AXL expression correlated with lower mOS in both cohorts. (Table) Intriguingly, AXL expression in tumor and stroma (+/+) correlated with shorter mOS; in particular, RAS WT pts (+/+) had a mOS of 19.9 m (CI95% 8.0- 31.7) vs (-/-) 50.1 m (CI95% 43.9- 56.2) p 0.004]. In silico analyses showed high AXL RNA levels in 50% of pts. Moreover, in this population treated with cetuximab, in the KRAS exon2 WT cohort (N = 43) AXL high pts had worse mPFS [1.9 m (CI95% 1.7 -2.0) vs 3.8 m (CI95% 0.7-6.7) p 0.59].Table: 121P
Cohort | AXL expression in tumor cells | AXL expression in stroma | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | N | Negative <1% (%) | Positive ≥1% (%) | PFS months p value | OS months p value | |
Overall population | 346 | 285 (82) | 61 (18) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.008 | 32.4 vs 23.0 0.007 | 334 | 66 (20) | 268 (80) | 10.7 vs 8.0 0.11 | 41.1 vs 28.5 0.004 |
RAS WT (overall) | 175 | 147 (84) | 28 (16) | 12.3 vs 6.6 <0.000 | 37.6 vs 19.9 0.006 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 15.0 vs 10.7 0.034 | 49.8 vs 33.5 0.031 |
RAS WT CT + anti-EGFR | 136 | 114 (84) | 22 (16) | 12.1 vs 6.2 0.012 | 35.8 vs 23.0 0.087 | 129 | 18 (14) | 111 (86) | 14.3 vs 10.4 0.37 | 44.4 vs 33.5 0.11 |
RAS WT CT + anti-angiogenic | 39 | 33 (85) | 6 (15) | 14.1 vs 6.7 0.007 | 44.8 vs 13.2 0.004 | 38 | 15 (39) | 23 (61) | 15.0 vs 11.0 0.12 | 50.1 vs 40.6 0.17 |
RAS mut (overall) CT + anti-angiogenic | 171 | 138 (81) | 33 (19) | 9.6 vs 8.9 0.78 | 27.6 vs 23.7 0.33 | 167 | 33 (20) | 134 (80) | 9.7 vs 9.2 0.98 | 35.5 vs 24.7 0.056 |
Conclusions
AXL expression in tumor and stroma might have a negative prognostic relevance in mCRC. In RAS WT pts, AXL expression might represent a predictive biomarker of lack of efficacy for both anti-EGFR and anti-angiogenic agents.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli".
Funding
AIRC MFAG-2015-ID: 7778.
Disclosure
F. Ciardiello: Advisory / Consultancy, Advisory Board: Merck KgA, Bayer, Amgen, Roche, Servier, Pfizer. E. Martinelli: Advisory / Consultancy: Merck KgA, Amgen, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract