Abstract 1058
Background
An accurate prognostic assessment of breast cancer patients after preoperative systemic therapy (PST) is critical for physicians to adjust the systemic treatments. While both CPS+EG and Neo-Bioscore provide a satisfactory prediction, they, however, have limitations due to the lack of targeted therapies in current clinical practice.
Methods
A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted from 12 participating hosipitals’ databases from 2006 to 2015. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Method. Area under the curve (AUC) of the three staging systems was compared. The detailed staging systems are summarized in Table. Wald test and maximum likelihood estimates in Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.
Results
A total of 1077 patients were enrolled. The CPS+EG, Neo-Bioscore, and modified Neo-Bioscore could all stratify the DFS, DSS and OS (all P < 0.001). While in the same stratum of Neo-Bioscore score 2 and 3, the HER2-positive patients without trastuzumab therapy had much poorer DSS (P = 0.013 and P values <0.01, respectively) as compared to HER2-positive patients with trastuzumab therapy and HER2-negative patients. Only the modified Neo-Bioscore had a significantly higher stratification of 5-year DSS than PS (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.65, P = 0.03).Table:
249P Point assignment for the CPS+EG, neo-bioscore, and modified neo-bioscore staging systems
| Cancer Stage | CPS+ EG Score | Neo-Bioscore (7 points) | Modified Neo-Bioscore (8 points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment Clinical Stage (CS) | |||
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IIA | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IIB | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIA | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIB | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| IIIC | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Post-treatment Pathologic Stage (PS) | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IIA | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIB | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIA | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIB | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIC | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Tumor Marker | |||
| ER negative | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| HER2-negative | 1 | 1 | |
| HER2-positive & no Trastuzumab | 2 |
Abbreviations: CPS+EG, clinical-pathologic staging system incorporating estrogen receptor–negative disease and nuclear grade 3 tumor pathology; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
Conclusions
The modified Neo-Bioscore could circumvent the limitation of CPS+EG or Neo-Bioscore. The access of appropriate treatment should be incorporated into the existing staging systems for more refined prognosis prediction.
Clinical trial identification
The trial protocol number: NCT03437837 Release date: February 19, 2018.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Xuening Duan AND Yimin Cui.
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3082 - Prognostic and predictive role of body mass index (BMI) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a pooled analisys of TRIBE and TRIBE-2 studies by GONO
Presenter: Emanuela Dell'Aquila
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3618 - Drug holidays and overall survival in patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Silvio Ken Garattini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
6111 - Quality of life during 1st-line FOLFOXIRI+/- panitumumab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the randomized VOLFI trial (AIO KRK-0109)
Presenter: Michael Geissler
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1042 - A biomarker combination indicating resistance to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in metastastic colorectal cancer : results of phase I of the PERMAD trial
Presenter: Thomas Seufferlein
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3291 - Microsatellite Instability (MSI) status and prognosis in colorectal cancer: meta-analysis
Presenter: James Toh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2046 - Choosing the right strategy based on individualized treatment effect predictions: Combination versus sequential chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Presenter: Miriam Koopman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2589 - Noninferiority on overall survival of every-2-weeks vs weekly schedule of cetuximab for first-line treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Stefan Kasper
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4944 - POLAF study: Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept in a phase II trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of plasmatic prognostic and predictive markers
Presenter: Maria Elena Elez Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2042 - The accuracy of the clinical PCI score in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Nadine De Boer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2667 - The impact of late-line treatment on overall survival (OS) from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy (CT) for patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Presenter: Takeshi Kawakami
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract