Abstract 1058
Background
An accurate prognostic assessment of breast cancer patients after preoperative systemic therapy (PST) is critical for physicians to adjust the systemic treatments. While both CPS+EG and Neo-Bioscore provide a satisfactory prediction, they, however, have limitations due to the lack of targeted therapies in current clinical practice.
Methods
A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted from 12 participating hosipitals’ databases from 2006 to 2015. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Method. Area under the curve (AUC) of the three staging systems was compared. The detailed staging systems are summarized in Table. Wald test and maximum likelihood estimates in Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.
Results
A total of 1077 patients were enrolled. The CPS+EG, Neo-Bioscore, and modified Neo-Bioscore could all stratify the DFS, DSS and OS (all P < 0.001). While in the same stratum of Neo-Bioscore score 2 and 3, the HER2-positive patients without trastuzumab therapy had much poorer DSS (P = 0.013 and P values <0.01, respectively) as compared to HER2-positive patients with trastuzumab therapy and HER2-negative patients. Only the modified Neo-Bioscore had a significantly higher stratification of 5-year DSS than PS (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.65, P = 0.03).Table:
249P Point assignment for the CPS+EG, neo-bioscore, and modified neo-bioscore staging systems
| Cancer Stage | CPS+ EG Score | Neo-Bioscore (7 points) | Modified Neo-Bioscore (8 points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment Clinical Stage (CS) | |||
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IIA | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IIB | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIA | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIB | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| IIIC | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Post-treatment Pathologic Stage (PS) | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IIA | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIB | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIA | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIB | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| IIIC | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Tumor Marker | |||
| ER negative | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| HER2-negative | 1 | 1 | |
| HER2-positive & no Trastuzumab | 2 |
Abbreviations: CPS+EG, clinical-pathologic staging system incorporating estrogen receptor–negative disease and nuclear grade 3 tumor pathology; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
Conclusions
The modified Neo-Bioscore could circumvent the limitation of CPS+EG or Neo-Bioscore. The access of appropriate treatment should be incorporated into the existing staging systems for more refined prognosis prediction.
Clinical trial identification
The trial protocol number: NCT03437837 Release date: February 19, 2018.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Xuening Duan AND Yimin Cui.
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5295 - Predictive factors and survival outcomes with stereotactic body radiation therapy in treatment of oligometastases in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract