Abstract 2150
Background
A decrease in AFP level during treatment has been associated with improved overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC. In the phase 3 RESORCE trial (NCT01774344), the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib significantly improved OS versus placebo in patients with HCC and disease progression on sorafenib. We analyzed OS in patients who had an AFP response in RESORCE.
Methods
Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C HCC, Child -Pugh A liver function, ECOG performance status 0 − 1, and documented radiologic progression on prior sorafenib were randomized 2:1 to regorafenib 160 mg/day (n = 379) or placebo (n = 194) for Weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle. Serum AFP levels were assessed at baseline, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at the end of treatment. Patients who had a baseline AFP ≥20 ng/mL and an AFP measurement at the start of Cycle 3 were evaluable for AFP response, defined as a decrease of ≥ 20% in AFP level from baseline at the start of Cycle 3.
Results
Overall, 232 of the 573 randomized patients fulfilled the above criteria and were included in the analysis. Patients with an AFP response had a median OS from randomization of 13.8 months vs 8.9 months in those without an AFP response (Table). The rate of AFP response was 46% (77/168) in the regorafenib group and 11% (7/64) in the placebo group. Among regorafenib-treated patients, the median OS was 13.8 months in patients with an AFP response vs 9.8 months in those without an AFP response. A landmark analysis of OS from the start of Cycle 3 showed that the hazard ratios for AFP response vs no response were 0.57 (95% CI 0.40, 0.82) in the regorafenib and placebo arms combined and 0.72 (95% CI 0.48, 1.08) for patients in the regorafenib arm.Table:
755P
Regorafenib + /placebo arms combined | Regorafenib arm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(n = 232) | (n = 168) | |||
AFP response (n = 84) | No AFP response (n = 148) | AFP response (n = 77) | No AFP response (n = 91) | |
Median OS (95% CI) from randomization, months | 13.8 (11.8, 16.5) | 8.9 (8.0, 9.7) | 13.8 (11.7, 16.5) | 9.8 (8.2, 14.2) |
HR (95% CI) AFP response yes/no | 0.57 (0.40, 0.82) | 0.72 (0.48, 1.07) | ||
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. |
Conclusions
In this exploratory analysis of RESORCE, an AFP response with regorafenib was associated with improved OS.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01774344.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Tobin of OPEN Health Medical Communications (London, UK), with financial support from Bayer.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bayer.
Funding
Bayer.
Disclosure
J. Bruix: Honoraria (self): Bayer; BTG; Eisai; Ipsen; Sirtex; Terumo; Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie; Adaptimmune; Arqule; Astra-Medimmune; Basilea; Bayer; Bio-Alliance; Bristol-Myers Squibb; BTG; Eisai; Gilead; Incyte; Ipsen; Kowa; Lilly; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Nerviano; Novartis; Quirem; Roche; Sanofi Aventis; Sirtex; Terumo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; BTG. M. Reig: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; BTG; Gilead; Ipsen; Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Lilly; Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Ipsen; Lilly. P. Merle: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Exelixis; Ipsen; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Onxeo; Roche. M. Kudo: Honoraria (self): Bayer; Eisai; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): AbbVie; Astellas Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Chugai; Daiichi Sankyo; EA Pharma; Eisai; Gilead; Medico’s Hirata; Otsuka; Taiho; Takeda. G. Meinhardt: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Bayer; Full / Part-time employment: Bayer. M. Zhang: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Bayer; Full / Part-time employment: Bayer. K. Ozgurdal: Full / Part-time employment: Bayer.
Resources from the same session
5185 - Systemic administration of the hyaluronidase-expressing oncolytic adenovirus VCN-01 in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: first-in-human clinical trial
Presenter: Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4842 - The analysis of genomic signatures of head and body/tail of pancreatic cancer in Chinese patients
Presenter: Qi Ling
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4988 - MGMT methylation in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC): a single center experience
Presenter: Monica Niger
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5035 - Advantage of three-dimensional image analysis of pancreatic cancer using computed tomography
Presenter: Seung Bae Yoon
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1465 - Phase I study of the oncolytic viral immunotherapy agent Canerpaturev (C-REV) with S-1 in patients with stage IV pancreatic cancer.
Presenter: Susumu Hijioka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1982 - Impact of anatomic site of biliary tract tumour origin and conditional probability of survival (CS): results from 15 prospective advanced first-line clinical trial
Presenter: Mairead McNamara
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2244 - FOLFOXIRI versus FOLFIRINOX in first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a propensity score analysis
Presenter: Angélique Vienot
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4557 - Cellfree tumor-DNA (cfDNA) as a very early predictor of therapeutic outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Presenter: Sabine Payr
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4406 - Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of gall bladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC) in patients from distinct ancestral populations
Presenter: Milind Javle
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4283 - Phase II Monotherapy Efficacy of Cancer Metabolism Targeting SM-88 in Heavily Pre-Treated PDAC Patients.
Presenter: Allyson Ocean
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract