Abstract 2150
Background
A decrease in AFP level during treatment has been associated with improved overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC. In the phase 3 RESORCE trial (NCT01774344), the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib significantly improved OS versus placebo in patients with HCC and disease progression on sorafenib. We analyzed OS in patients who had an AFP response in RESORCE.
Methods
Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C HCC, Child -Pugh A liver function, ECOG performance status 0 − 1, and documented radiologic progression on prior sorafenib were randomized 2:1 to regorafenib 160 mg/day (n = 379) or placebo (n = 194) for Weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle. Serum AFP levels were assessed at baseline, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at the end of treatment. Patients who had a baseline AFP ≥20 ng/mL and an AFP measurement at the start of Cycle 3 were evaluable for AFP response, defined as a decrease of ≥ 20% in AFP level from baseline at the start of Cycle 3.
Results
Overall, 232 of the 573 randomized patients fulfilled the above criteria and were included in the analysis. Patients with an AFP response had a median OS from randomization of 13.8 months vs 8.9 months in those without an AFP response (Table). The rate of AFP response was 46% (77/168) in the regorafenib group and 11% (7/64) in the placebo group. Among regorafenib-treated patients, the median OS was 13.8 months in patients with an AFP response vs 9.8 months in those without an AFP response. A landmark analysis of OS from the start of Cycle 3 showed that the hazard ratios for AFP response vs no response were 0.57 (95% CI 0.40, 0.82) in the regorafenib and placebo arms combined and 0.72 (95% CI 0.48, 1.08) for patients in the regorafenib arm.Table:
755P
Regorafenib + /placebo arms combined | Regorafenib arm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(n = 232) | (n = 168) | |||
AFP response (n = 84) | No AFP response (n = 148) | AFP response (n = 77) | No AFP response (n = 91) | |
Median OS (95% CI) from randomization, months | 13.8 (11.8, 16.5) | 8.9 (8.0, 9.7) | 13.8 (11.7, 16.5) | 9.8 (8.2, 14.2) |
HR (95% CI) AFP response yes/no | 0.57 (0.40, 0.82) | 0.72 (0.48, 1.07) | ||
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. |
Conclusions
In this exploratory analysis of RESORCE, an AFP response with regorafenib was associated with improved OS.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01774344.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Tobin of OPEN Health Medical Communications (London, UK), with financial support from Bayer.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bayer.
Funding
Bayer.
Disclosure
J. Bruix: Honoraria (self): Bayer; BTG; Eisai; Ipsen; Sirtex; Terumo; Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie; Adaptimmune; Arqule; Astra-Medimmune; Basilea; Bayer; Bio-Alliance; Bristol-Myers Squibb; BTG; Eisai; Gilead; Incyte; Ipsen; Kowa; Lilly; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Nerviano; Novartis; Quirem; Roche; Sanofi Aventis; Sirtex; Terumo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; BTG. M. Reig: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; BTG; Gilead; Ipsen; Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Lilly; Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Ipsen; Lilly. P. Merle: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Exelixis; Ipsen; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Onxeo; Roche. M. Kudo: Honoraria (self): Bayer; Eisai; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): AbbVie; Astellas Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Chugai; Daiichi Sankyo; EA Pharma; Eisai; Gilead; Medico’s Hirata; Otsuka; Taiho; Takeda. G. Meinhardt: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Bayer; Full / Part-time employment: Bayer. M. Zhang: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Bayer; Full / Part-time employment: Bayer. K. Ozgurdal: Full / Part-time employment: Bayer.
Resources from the same session
1452 - RBP-Jκ in colon cancer cells facilitates tumor associated macrophages (TAMs)-induced cell metastasis by secreting CXCL11
Presenter: Meng jie Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2786 - Development of a living organoid biobank derived from colorectal cancer patients: towards personalized medicine
Presenter: Federica Papaccio
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3351 - Microsatellite Instability Detection in Colorectal Cancer: 44-Center Comparison between the Idylla MSI Assay and Routine Molecular and Immunohistochemistry Tests on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue
Presenter: Xavier Matias-guiu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4901 - Expression profile of EPHB3 and its prognostic significance in colorectal cancer progression (Running head: Prognostic value of EPHB3 in colorectal cancers)
Presenter: Bogun Jang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5030 - A pan-ErbB family inhibitor, AF8c, promotes apoptosis by DR5/Nrf2 activation via ROS in colorectal cancer cells
Presenter: Soyeon Jeong
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5053 - Frequent BRAF, GNAS and SMAD4 mutations identified in Colorectal Mucinous Carcinomas
Presenter: Sun Mi Lee
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5220 - Impact of CCL4 knockout using CRISPR Cas-9 technology on colorectal tumor progression
Presenter: Roba Barakat
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5330 - Independent clinical validation of a gene expression profile to predict benefit of 5-FU in metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Buhl
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5515 - WRN mutated Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is characterized by a distinct molecular and immunological profile
Presenter: Andreas Seeber
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5716 - Mutation analysis of B2M gene in colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability
Presenter: Ivana Kašubová
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract