Abstract 4561
Background
Discrepancies in perception of adverse events between patients and physicians may influence the follow up services of cancer patients. With patient ratings as the gold standard, physicians more often underrate the symptom severities. In breast cancer (BC) populations, studies of interrater agreement are deficient. We evaluated the agreement between BC patients and their oncologists on the rating of symptoms and functioning in a clinical follow-up study at Trondheim University Hospital.
Methods
At five clinical controls during the first year after primary treatment BC patients (n = 250) and their oncologist (n = 14) reported symptoms and functions by completing the EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-BR23 and CTCAE questionnaires, respectively. Fatigue, hot flushes, breast pain, arm pain, emotional and physical functioning were comparable and scored on a four point Likert scale: not at all, mild, moderate and severe. The degree of agreement was evaluated by the Kappa(κ) coefficient. The McNemar-Bowker Test was used to test for association between raters and rating outcome.
Results
Four symptoms and two functions were assessed five times. Of 35 assessments, poor agreement (κ < 0.20) was identified on 24 assessments, fair agreement (0.21< κ > 0.40) on 10 assessments and moderate agreement (κ = 0.41) on one assessment (physical function). Overall, the oncologists rated the severity of all symptoms and the functions significantly lower than the patients (p < 0.01). The agreement decreased with increasing symptom severity and function impairment.
Conclusions
Discrepancies in reporting symptom severity between patients and oncologists might be due to high subjectiveness of symptoms and different understanding of the construct being measured. Personal characteristics of both raters, the context of the clinical controls and the nature of the relationship between patients and physicians may also contribute to discrepancies. Our results emphasize the importance of collecting patient reported data during follow up after BC treatment as it may improve diagnosis and treatment of adverse effects.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
NTNU, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, the authors.
Funding
Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1885 - Factors associated with disease progression in patients treated with trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: an open label, non randomized study
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5259 - Integrative RNAseq and Target panel sequencing reveals common and distinct innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibitors
Presenter: Phil Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5619 - Effective treatment with T-VEC monotherapy in Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a Melanoma of the Head & Neck Region
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5666 - Re-introduction of T-VEC Monotherapy in Recurrent Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a melanoma is effective
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4117 - Efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients (pts) with locoregional (LR) recurrence, including in-transit metastases (ITM): subgroup analysis of the phase 3 OPTiM study
Presenter: Mark Middleton
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5303 - Real Life Use of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Melanoma in Centers in Austria and Switzeland
Presenter: Christoph Hoeller
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4130 - Outcomes of advanced melanoma patients who discontinued pembrolizumab (pembro) after complete response (CR) in the French early access program (EAP)
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2050 - Outcome of patients with elevated LDH treated with first-line targeted therapy (TT) or PD-1 based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)
Presenter: Sarah Knispel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1618 - Comparative-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Nivolumab for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: Justin Moser
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3556 - Long-term efficacy of combination nivolumab and ipilimumab for first-line treatment of advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract