Abstract 3462
Background
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and nivolumab (NIVO) are key components of systemic therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We tested if TKI induction followed by an early switch to NIVO improved outcome in mRCC.
Methods
Key inclusion criteria were measurable advanced or metastatic ccRCC, ECOG PS 0-2, adequate organ function, and PR or SD after sunitinib (50 mg, 4-2 regime) or pazopanib (800 mg OD) for 10-12 weeks. 1:1 randomized to either continue TKI treatment or receive nivolumab 240 or 480 mg IV q2-4wks, until PD or intolerance. Imaging occurred q12wks and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) was assessed monthly x3 and q12wks thereafter (FKSI-15). Primary and key secondary endpoints were survival rate at 2 years and ORR, respectively. The trial stopped prematurely for low accrual after 49 of 244 patients were randomized.
Results
25 and 24 pts. were randomized to receive NIVO or TKI continuation, respectively. Median age was 65 years (range: 35-79), 40 pts. (82%) were male and 2 pts. (4%) had an ECOG PS of 2. MSKCC risk categories: favorable, intermediate, poor were (n; %): 15 (31), 32 (65) and 2 (4). Pazopanib was used in 22 (45). Response to TKI induction was PR in 29 (59) and SD in 20 (41). In the ITT population, best overall response rate measured from start of induction therapy was not significantly different for NIVO vs. TKI (64 vs. 70%, P = 0.76). However, when measured from time of randomization, ORR for NIVO vs. TKI was 16 vs. 48% (P = 0.029). Adverse events (AE) for NIVO vs. TKI occurred in 96% vs. 100% (all grades) and 44% vs. 67% (grades 3-5), respectively. Serious AE (SAE) for NIVO vs. TKI continuation were reported in 10 (40) and 9 (38), respectively.Table:
959P Best overall response to nivolumab or TKI treatment (ITT population)
From start of TKI induction | From randomization | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | NIVO | TKI | Total | NIVO | TKI | Total |
n | 25 | 23 | 48 | 25 | 23 | 48 |
CR | -- | 1 (4%) | 1 (2%) | -- | 1 (4%) | 1 (2%) |
PR | 16 (64%) | 15 (65%) | 31 (65%) | 4 (16%) | 10 (43%) | 14 (29) |
SD | 9 (36%) | 7 (30%) | 16 (33%) | 6 (24%) | 7 (30%) | 13 (27%) |
PD | -- | -- | -- | 11 (44%) | 3 (13%) | 14 (29%) |
NE | -- | -- | -- | 4 (16%) | 2 (9%) | 6 (12%) |
Conclusions
TKI induction followed by early switch to NIVO did not improve ORR in patients responsive to TKI. These results do not support the notion that TKI pretreatment sensitizes for nivolumab efficacy. Major limitations of our trial are the premature closure and the limited sample size.
Clinical trial identification
2016-002170-13; NCT02959554.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AIO-Studien-gGmbH, Berlin.
Funding
Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
V. Grünwald: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Cerulean; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Art tempi; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: COCS; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: ClinSol; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: EUSAPharm; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MedUpdate; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck Serono; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MedKomAkademie; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: NewConceptOncology; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Johnson & Johnson; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: PharmaMar; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: PeerVoice; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: StreamedUp!; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: ThinkWired!. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5529 - Safety and efficacy of Ac-225-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after failure of Lu-177-PSMA
Presenter: Robert Tauber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3611 - Phase II trial of SM 88 in Non-Metastatic Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Presenter: Benjamin Gartrell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2492 - A phase 1 study of Ad5 PSA/MUC-1/Brachyury Vaccine in Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Marijo Bilusic
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3142 - Multicenter Phase I Trial of a DNA Vaccine Encoding the Androgen Receptor Ligand Binding Domain (pTVG-AR, MVI-118) in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Presenter: Douglas McNeel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4327 - Impact of germline mutations in Homologous Recombination (HR) genes on the response to Radium-223 for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Elena Castro
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3600 - Serum biomarkers of bone metabolism in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with Radium-223 (Ra223): Results from a prospective multicentre study
Presenter: Nuria Romero Laorden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3742 - Prognostic value of tumor suppression genes (TP53, PTEN, Rb) in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Miguel Gonzalez Velez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2643 - Germline sequencing of advanced prostate cancer patients in the BARCODE2 trial
Presenter: Sarah Benafif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4349 - Impact of treatment sequence in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): data from the prospective PROREPAIR-B study.
Presenter: Carlo Cattrini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3301 - Implications of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in Androgen Related-Genes in Outcome of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with Abiraterone (Abi) and Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Isabel Aragon
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract